| 145746 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | N | Renaming of Chestnut Street Extending between Edward Street and Elm Street | 2026.TE31.1 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that the name "Heather McGregor Way" be approved to rename a section of Chestnut Street extending between Edward Street and Elm Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/">https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal is in alignment with the objectives of the <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/9844-Guiding-Principles-for-Commemoration.pdf">Guiding Principles</a> for Commemoration in the Public Realm.</p> | 31 | 1 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ACTION | true | Adopted | 9:30 AM | … | … | … | … | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 145743 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.2 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit an 11-storey mixed-use rental building at 3286, 3290, 3296, 3298, 3300, 3308 and 3316 Dundas Street West. The application proposes a total of 191 residential units (including 6 rental replacement units) with a residential gross floor area of 12,937 square metres and 384 square metres of non-residential gross floor area. 99 vehicular and 212 bicycle parking spaces are also proposed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Rental Housing Demolition application has also been received by the City to address rental replacement obligations for the six existing rental units on site in conjunction with the Zoning By-law amendment application. A Rental Housing Demolition report will be considered in conjunction with this report at the April 1, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council meeting. The proposal includes the demolition of six rental housing units, to be replaced by a total of six rental units as part of the new development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposed development will provide diversity of unit types, retail ground floor use along Dundas Street West and an improved public realm.</p> | 31 | 2 |
| 145602 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 3286-3316 Dundas Street West - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.3 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 6 rental dwelling units located at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West. The 6 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development on the site at 3286-3316 Dundas Street West is the subject of a related Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 165357 STE 04 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 11-storey (35m including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building with 191 dwelling units, including 6 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 31 | 3 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report |
| 145715 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.4 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a seven-storey mixed-use building at 3459 and 3461 Dundas Street West. The application proposes a total of 2,520 square metres of gross floor area (GFA), including 45 dwelling units and 65 square metres of non-residential GFA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024 (PPS, 2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The proposed development will provide a diversity of unit types, retail space at grade along Dundas Street West and an improved public realm.</p> | 31 | 4 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council |
| 145718 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 1423 Dufferin Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.5 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 9 storey mixed-use building at 1423 Dufferin Street. The proposed building includes 60 purpose-built rental units, with a total gross floor area of 3,961 square metres including 123 square metres of ground floor commercial-retail space along Dufferin Street. The proposed development includes a 1.37 metre laneway widening on Lane W Bristol N Geary. The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan.</p> | 31 | 5 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council |
| 145738 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 333 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 200 Queens Quay East, and 2, 11, and 11 R Small Street (Quayside Blocks 3, 4 and 5) - Draft Plan of Subdivision Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.6 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report advises that the Executive Director, Development Review, acting under delegated authority, intends to approve the Draft Plan of Subdivision necessary to facilitate the second phase of development of the Quayside lands, encompassing 333 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 200 Queens Quay East, and 2, 11, and 11 R Small Street, as well as portions of the current Parliament Street alignment and Queens Quay East ("Quayside Phase Two"), subject to conditions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application proposes to create a total of eight blocks, consisting of an extension of Queens Quay East, the creation of two development blocks with a combined size of 1.015 hectares, two public streets, two public parks (Silo Park and the Water’s Edge Promenade) and Parliament Slip lake fill. The approval of the Draft Plan of Subdivision will be subject to conditions that require the transfer of streets and parkland into public ownership, the reservation of a block for a school site, construction of municipal services, and other matters that will facilitate the orderly development of Quayside Phase Two lands.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024). The application also conforms to the City's Official Plan, Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, Keating Channel Precinct Plan, and has regard for the criteria in Section 51(24) of the Planning Act, subject to addressing outstanding matters from the ongoing technical review of the application.</p> | 31 | 6 |
| 145719 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | Y | 1 to 7 Yonge Street, South Block - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.7 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to convert the existing 25-storey office building into a hotel with 487 suites on the south block of the property at 1 to 7 Yonge Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. The adaptive reuse of an existing building is an appropriate and efficient use of land.</p> | 31 | 7 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … |
| 145753 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | Y | 1233 Yonge Street and 9 Woodlawn Avenue East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.8 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 47-storey mixed-use building (155 metres, excluding mechanical penthouse), containing 730 dwelling units (including 40 replacement rental units) and 250 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Official Plan Amendment is required to permit the proposed height on the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Rental Housing Demolition Report will be considered in conjunction with this Report at the April 1, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council meeting. The proposal includes the demolition of 40 rental housing units, to be replaced by a total of 40 rental units as part of the new development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p> | 31 | 8 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145638 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | Y | 1233 Yonge Street and 9 Woodlawn Avenue East - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.9 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 40 rental dwelling units located at 1233 Yonge Street and 9 Woodlawn Avenue East. The 40 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 251886 STE 11 OZ) which would permit a 47-storey residential building with 730 dwelling units, including 40 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 31 | 9 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report |
| 145756 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | 55-77 Davisville Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.10 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 121.5-metre (37-storeys excluding mechanical penthouse) residential building with approximately 29,271 square metres of total gross floor area at 55-77 Davisville Avenue. A new mid-block connection is proposed along the east lot line from Davisville Avenue to Balliol Street. A new 406-square-metre park is also proposed on site, with frontage along Balliol Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application also proposes to retain the existing 29-storey rental apartment building at 77 Davisville containing 483 rental dwelling units.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed Zoning By-law Amendment application is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan and the Yonge-Eglinton Secondary Plan.</p> | 31 | 10 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main |
| 145742 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 10 Rosehill Avenue - City-Initiated Temporary Use Zoning By-law - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.11 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends the approval of a City-initiated Temporary Use Zoning By-law to temporarily permit concert hall, place of amusement, place of assembly and communications and broadcasting establishment uses within the existing building at 10 Rosehill Avenue for a period of three years.</p> | 31 | 11 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 145733 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.12 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 8 rental dwelling units located at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue. The 8 rental units are proposed to be replaced offsite within new multiplexes at 257 and 261 Poplar Plains Road. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to move directly from their existing unit to one of the replacement units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The properties at 1196-1210 Yonge Street and 2-8 Birch Avenue are the subject of a Zoning By-law Amendment application (21 239174 STE 12 OZ), which was appealed to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT). The OLT issued a written decision on October 10, 2024, approving a settlement on the Zoning Bylaw Amendment for a 31-storey mixed-used building with 122 dwelling units, with the final Order being withheld until all outstanding matters, including the necessary agreements with the City and rental housing matters, are secured. City Council subsequently endorsed a revised proposal by the applicant to revise the OLT decision to allow for a 32 storey mixed-use building with 64 units. The revised proposal is subject to approval by the OLT.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 31 | 12 | CCOUNCIL |
| 145412 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal | 2026.TE31.13 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building (38.5 metres including mechanical penthouse) at 509 Parliament Street. The proposal includes 60 dwelling units and approximately 278 square metres of ground floor retail.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was identified by City Council as meriting designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not yet in force and effect. The proposal includes partial retention of the front façade within the new development. A separate report from Heritage Planning regarding the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 31 | 13 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | — |
| 145939 | REPORT | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report | 2026.TE31.13a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On January 13, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council considered a Zoning By-law Amendment application, and an application for alterations to the proposed designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street, to permit a 10-storey mixed use building. Toronto and East York Community Council adjourned the public meeting and deferred consideration on both the Zoning By-Law Amendment application and the alterations to the proposed heritage property until the following meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On February 19, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council considered a Zoning By-law Amendment application and an application for alterations to the proposed designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street. Toronto and East York Community Council adjourned the public meeting and deferred both the Zoning By-Law Amendment application and the alterations to the proposed heritage property until the April 1, 2026, meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 18, 2026, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This Report is provided as an update in response to the OLT appeal and recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to support the application in its current form.</p> | 31 | 13 | CCOUNCIL |
| 145428 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE31.14 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 145801 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE31.14a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.6">PB37.6</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 145758 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.15 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit an 11-storey mixed use building at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue. The proposed development would include 123 dwelling units including 11 rental replacement units, 132 square metres of new non-residential gross floor area and two levels of underground parking.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context.</p> | 31 | 15 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main | — | Public Notice Given |
| 145731 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE31.16 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 11 rental dwelling units located at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue. The 11 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development on the site at 419, 421, 423 and 425 Woodbine Avenue is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (25 131074 STE 19 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 11-storey residential building with 123 dwelling units, including 11 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 31 | 16 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … |
| 145695 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 19 to 37 Queens Quay East (Pier 27, Phase 3) - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report | 2026.TE31.17 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On April 21, 2021, an application to amend the Official Plan and the Zoning By-law was submitted to amend the development permissions for the two remaining buildings to be constructed on the Pier 27 development site at 19-37 Queens Quay East (the "Pier 27 Lands").</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Building A (25 Queens Quay East) has Site Plan Approval for a 13 storey building, comprising 132 residential units, at-grade retail fronting onto Queens Quay East, and a childcare centre. The application proposes to reduce the number of storeys at Building A to 11 storeys, while increasing the number of residential units to 136 units. Building F (35 Queens Quay East) also has Site Plan Approval for 13 storeys, comprising 139 residential units. The application proposes to increase the height of Building F to 45 storeys and to increase the number of residential units to 449 units.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On October 27, 2025, the applicant appealed the application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the time frame required in the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues.</p> | 31 | 17 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York |
| 145751 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street - Community Benefits Charge In-kind Contribution | 2026.TE31.18 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On March 20 and 21, 2024, City Council directed staff to continue discussions with the owner of 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street on the provision of affordable housing on the lands as a Community Benefits Charge (CBC) in-kind contribution and report back to City Council on the outcome of any proposed agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On June 7, 2024, the Ontario Land Tribunal held a settlement hearing to consider a Zoning By-law Amendment application for a 58-storey mixed-use building with 557 dwelling units, which was approved in principle in the Tribunal's decision issued on June 24, 2024. The final Order was issued on December 3, 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to report back to City Council on the applicant's offer to provide 10 affordable rental housing units for 25 years as a CBC in-kind contribution at 353 and 355 Adelaide Street West, 46 Charlotte Street and 16 Oxley Street. The proposed in-kind contribution represents 100 percent of 4 percent of the value of the site, in accordance with the CBC By-law.</p> | 31 | 18 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report |
| 145757 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Community Benefits Charge In-kind Offer | 2026.TE31.19 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On December 16, 2025 City Council approved Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendments to permit the construction of a 62.3 metre (20 storeys) mixed-use building containing 638 privately-owned student residence units at 333 College Street and the rear part of 303 Augusta Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As part of the approval, City Council directed that the Executive Director, Development Review, in consultation with the local Ward Councillor and the City Solicitor, to work with the applicant to finalize an in-kind community benefit contribution pursuant to Section 37(6) of the Planning Act, of up to forty (40) percent of the Community Benefits Charges value, to provide such genealogical and/or other research as the City may require to support bringing into City ownership the lanes that abut 333 College Street (known as Ellen Avenue) and the lanes that abut and provide emergency access to Kensington Community School, and to provide lighting, paving, and public realm improvements for such lanes to the reasonable satisfaction of Transportation Services, and to report back to City Council for further instruction, if required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Council also requested the Mayor, as part of the Budget process, to allocate sixty (60) percent of the Community Benefits Charges funds collected from the development at 333 College Street to the Toronto Community Housing Corporation for capital upgrades to Toronto Community Housing Corporation affordable housing properties in Ward 11, in consultation with the local Councillor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to report back to City Council on the agreed-to CBC in-kind contribution that will be used toward paving the lane adjacent to the site (known as Ellen Avenue) in concrete to City standards, including related subgrade work, and genealogical or other research to support bringing Ellen Avenue and the lanes that abut and provide emergency access to Kensington Community School into City ownership.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff have determined that the value of the Community Benefits Charge would not be sufficient to achieve improvements to the lane abutting and providing access to Kensington Community School in addition to the work on Ellen Avenue. Potential future acquisition of these lanes by the City would allow for further opportunities for the city to implement improvements.</p> |
| 145780 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative - Proposals Report | 2026.TE31.20 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>West Chinatown is a vibrant, inclusive and culturally rich community with an important history. This report provides an update on the Chinatown Tomorrow Planning Initiative, which aims to understand the unique character of West Chinatown and how to effectively plan for new development that will conserve and support the existing built form and cultural heritage; preserve the unique retail character; contribute to affordable housing; and ensure that the public realm, parkland and community services meet the needs of the community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This proposals report presents a draft West Chinatown Planning Framework as well as proposed policy changes through Official Plan Amendments and a Zoning By-law Amendment, to guide future development in the area. The purpose of this recommendation is to bring together and translate community priorities into directions on community and economic development, land use planning and development. Additional community consultation will be completed in Q2 of 2026 and staff intend to bring forward a Final Report in July 2026.</p> | 31 | 20 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report |
| 145781 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Hoverlink Terminal Proposal Update | 2026.TE31.21 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In May 2023, Hoverlink Ontario Incorporated (“Hoverlink”) notified the City of its intent to initiate a hovercraft service between Toronto and St. Catherines in the Niagara Region. Subsequently, the Toronto and East York Community Council requested that staff report on project-related technical studies which would assess the impact of the introduction of this service. Hoverlink proposes to start its service in the first quarter of 2028 at the earliest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report provides an update on the process to assess information to be provided on the proposed Hoverlink hovercraft service and associated terminal facilities. This report also outlines expectations around information sharing and issues identification. Hoverlink has indicated that it is willing to provide technical information and to work collaboratively with the City on the project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed terminal, made up of a landing pad, docking station and passenger waiting area, is proposed to be located on the south side of the Western Gap at Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport. Hoverlink clients will use ferries or Billy Bishop Airport pedestrian tunnel to access Downtown Toronto and local transportation and transit connections. All vessel servicing would occur in St. Catharines, where Hoverlink has entered into a lease with Transport Canada/St. Lawrence Seaway to locate maintenance and deliveries infrastructure, and other facilities.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The technical information provided by Hoverlink will be subject to a staff review and comment, which may result in future discussions with Hoverlink to resolve outstanding matters. Coordination with the Toronto Port Authority will be required as there is no City approval or regulatory process that applies in this case. Staff will report back in the second quarter of 2027 with a further update, once additional information is available.</p> |
| 145755 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE31.22 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development site, known as the Liquor Control Board of Ontario complex, comprises a buff brick Office Building and Warehouse Building. The buildings are purpose-built rare examples of a provincial headquarters and a commercial and industrial complex from the development of Toronto's Central Waterfront in the 20th-century.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On May 11 and 12, 2022, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property to allow for the construction of three towers above the Office Building and the Warehouse Building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application and a new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development application for the subject property proposes to place the tower above the Warehouse Building only. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 146021 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE31.22a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB42.3">PB42.3</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (March 30, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage property at 55 Lake Shore Boulevard East under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed development of the subject property. The application for Site Plan Control is subject to a Heritage Permit application under the Ontario Heritage Act because a previously approved application related to an approved Zoning By-law Amendment has been revised.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development site, known as the Liquor Control Board of Ontario complex, comprises a buff brick Office Building and Warehouse Building. The buildings are purpose-built rare examples of a provincial headquarters and a commercial and industrial complex from the development of Toronto's Central Waterfront in the 20th-century.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On May 11 and 12, 2022, City Council approved recommendations to alter the heritage property to allow for the construction of three towers above the Office Building and the Warehouse Building. Since the previous scheme was approved, the applicant has revised the conservation strategy accompanying the related Site Plan Control application and a new Heritage Impact Assessment was prepared by Giaimo + Associates Architects Inc., dated March 9, 2026, that considers the impact of the revised proposal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development application for the subject property proposes to place the tower above the Warehouse Building only. As a result of the proposed changes to the previous scheme, an amended Heritage Easement Agreement will be required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations continue to conserve the onsite and adjacent heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 145544 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Bloor - Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment - Final Report | 2026.TE31.23 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report summarizes the findings of the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). Staff recommend that Council adopt the list of identified properties with potential cultural heritage value or interest in Attachment 2. Staff also recommend that Council direct staff to review a portion of the Yorkville Village Core to determine if the area, or a part thereof, merits Council’s authorization of a Heritage Conservation District study under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>In April 2017, Council directed the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to prepare a new Site and Area Specific Policy for the Bloor-Yorkville Area. In early 2021, City Planning initiated the Bloor-Yorkville Secondary Plan Study, inclusive of a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). A CHRA documents and analyzes an area’s development history to identify properties with potential cultural heritage value and to make heritage conservation recommendations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Historic Context Statement (HCS) is produced within the CHRA to explain the area’s contemporary form and character. The HCS identifies significant periods of historical evolution, analyzes key themes, studies individual properties in relation to themes and historic periods and considers the relationship of properties to one another and their context, to inform the identification of buildings and landscapes with potential cultural heritage value.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In February 2021, Heritage Planning staff and a consultant team, Common Bond Collective, initiated the CHRA, which included community engagement within the Secondary Plan study and through a Heritage Focus Group. In the fall of 2022, the Secondary Plan study was put on hold, and the related CHRA was paused.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On June 19, 2024, Official Plan Amendment 720 came into effect City-wide, which among other matters, established the requirement for a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) under Schedule 3 of the Official Plan for Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision applications where a property has been adopted by City Council through a City-led study as having potential cultural heritage value or interest, but which is not included on the Heritage Register.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the Provincial Planning Policy (PPS 2024) Policy 4.6.4 (b) encourages planning authorities to develop and implement proactive strategies for conserving significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes, Heritage Planning along with its consultants re-activated the CHRA in summer 2025 and completed the final report in December 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report presents the methodology and results of the City-led Bloor-Yorkville CHRA consultant study and provides staff recommendations, including the identification of 88 properties with potential cultural heritage value and the potential to authorize a study of a portion of the Yorkville Village Core as a potential Heritage Conservation District. The CHRA also identified the need for city staff to continue Indigenous engagement within the study area to identify places that hold cultural heritage value for Indigenous communities.</p> |
| 145725 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | Bloor - Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment - Final Report | 2026.TE31.23a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 12, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB41.4">PB41.4</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (February 25, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report summarizes the findings of the Bloor-Yorkville Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). Staff recommend that Council adopt the list of identified properties with potential cultural heritage value or interest in Attachment 2. Staff also recommend that Council direct staff to review a portion of the Yorkville Village Core to determine if the area, or a part thereof, merits Council’s authorization of a Heritage Conservation District study under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In April 2017, Council directed the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York District to prepare a new Site and Area Specific Policy for the Bloor-Yorkville Area. In early 2021, City Planning initiated the Bloor-Yorkville Secondary Plan Study, inclusive of a Cultural Heritage Resource Assessment (CHRA). A CHRA documents and analyzes an area’s development history to identify properties with potential cultural heritage value and to make heritage conservation recommendations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Historic Context Statement (HCS) is produced within the CHRA to explain the area’s contemporary form and character. The HCS identifies significant periods of historical evolution, analyzes key themes, studies individual properties in relation to themes and historic periods and considers the relationship of properties to one another and their context, to inform the identification of buildings and landscapes with potential cultural heritage value.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In February 2021, Heritage Planning staff and a consultant team, Common Bond Collective, initiated the CHRA, which included community engagement within the Secondary Plan study and through a Heritage Focus Group. In the fall of 2022, the Secondary Plan study was put on hold, and the related CHRA was paused.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On June 19, 2024, Official Plan Amendment 720 came into effect City-wide, which among other matters, established the requirement for a Cultural Heritage Evaluation Report (CHER) under Schedule 3 of the Official Plan for Official Plan Amendments, Zoning By-law Amendments and Plan of Subdivision applications where a property has been adopted by City Council through a City-led study as having potential cultural heritage value or interest, but which is not included on the Heritage Register.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the Provincial Planning Policy (PPS 2024) Policy 4.6.4(b) encourages planning authorities to develop and implement proactive strategies for conserving significant built heritage resources and cultural heritage landscapes, Heritage Planning along with its consultants re-activated the CHRA in summer 2025 and completed the final report in December 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report presents the methodology and results of the City-led Bloor-Yorkville CHRA consultant study and provides staff recommendations, including the identification of 88 properties with potential cultural heritage value and the potential to authorize a study of a portion of the Yorkville Village Core as a potential Heritage Conservation District. The CHRA also identified the need for city staff to continue Indigenous engagement within the study area to identify places that hold cultural heritage value for Indigenous communities.</p> |
| 145413 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | — | N | 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal | 2026.TE31.24 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.</p> | 31 | 24 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main | — |
| 145820 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal | 2026.TE31.24a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on February 11, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB40.7">PB40.7</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (January 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p>The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.</p> | 31 | 24 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter |
| 145727 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 8 Prince Arthur Avenue - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval | 2026.TE31.25 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a rear addition on the fourth through six storeys of an existing three storey addition to provide expanded office accommodation.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property is located on the north side of Prince Arthur Avenue between Bedford Road and Avenue Road and contains a three-storey building with stucco cladding constructed circa 1886 with a non-original three-storey brick clad rear addition. The subject lands are part of the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development proposal includes adding three additional floors at the rear half of the existing three-storey building for a total of six storeys. The new addition would be three storeys higher than the ridge of the existing heritage building and would therefore not comply with the guidelines for additions in the EAHCD Plan which state that additions should be lower than the height of the existing ridge. Notwithstanding this, the EAHCD Plan recognises that substantial development in the rear yards is possible on some portions of Prince Arthur Avenue and that rear additions here should not "over-power the existing buildings and preferably should have low visibility from the street."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff are supportive of the proposed rear addition which is set behind the roof ridge of the existing building and setback over 20 metres from the street and would therefore not "over-power" the existing heritage building. The visual prominence of the heritage building within the public realm would remain. Similar rear additions have been approved on other properties along Prince Arthur Avenue, although they were only four or five storeys in height.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The conservation strategy will fully retain in situ the existing building with minor alterations proposed to the exterior and the existing roof. Alterations include new landscaping to the front yard, a new porch roof and general repairs including a new slate roof, if required. The existing mature tree in the front yard is to be retained.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 11, 2026, a minor variance application for this proposal was considered by the Committee of Adjustment.</p> |
| 146020 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 8 Prince Arthur Avenue - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval | 2026.TE31.25a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB42.2">PB42.2</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (March 13, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the property at 8 Prince Arthur Avenue under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act in connection with the construction of a rear addition on the fourth through six storeys of an existing three storey addition to provide expanded office accommodation</p>
<p>.</p>
<p>The subject property is located on the north side of Prince Arthur Avenue between Bedford Road and Avenue Road and contains a three-storey building with stucco cladding constructed circa 1886 with a non-original three-storey brick clad rear addition. The subject lands are part of the East Annex Heritage Conservation District (EAHCD).</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development proposal includes adding three additional floors at the rear half of the existing three-storey building for a total of six storeys. The new addition would be three storeys higher than the ridge of the existing heritage building and would therefore not comply with the guidelines for additions in the EAHCD Plan which state that additions should be lower than the height of the existing ridge. Notwithstanding this, the EAHCD Plan recognises that substantial development in the rear yards is possible on some portions of Prince Arthur Avenue and that rear additions here should not "over-power the existing buildings and preferably should have low visibility from the street."</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Staff are supportive of the proposed rear addition which is set behind the roof ridge of the existing building and setback over 20 metres from the street and would therefore not "over-power" the existing heritage building. The visual prominence of the heritage building within the public realm would remain. Similar rear additions have been approved on other properties along Prince Arthur Avenue, although they were only four or five storeys in height.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The conservation strategy will fully retain in situ the existing building with minor alterations proposed to the exterior and the existing roof. Alterations include new landscaping to the front yard, a new porch roof and general repairs including a new slate roof, if required. The existing mature tree in the front yard is to be retained.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 11, 2026, a minor variance application for this proposal was considered by the Committee of Adjustment.</p> |
| 145543 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 699 and 707 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Refusal | 2026.TE31.26 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council refuse alterations to the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street contains a 3-storey brick row building constructed in 1887. The Brass Rail Tavern has operated at 699 Yonge Street since 1948. Both halves of the commercial row at 699 and 707 Yonge Street have been over-clad, obscuring the original brick walls underneath.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application, the redevelopment proposes a 64-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building, which retains the façade of the heritage building and incorporates it into the three-storey base of the tower, with a stepback depth of 3 metres from the heritage façade on the Yonge Street (west) elevation.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed 3-metre tower stepback from Yonge Street above the heritage building and the proposed treatment of the front elevation at the ground floor do not adequately conserve the property's cultural heritage values and attributes. Therefore, the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment does not conform with the policies of the Official Plan and does not conserve the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street.</p> | 31 | 26 | CCOUNCIL |
| 145722 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 699 and 707 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Refusal | 2026.TE31.26a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 12, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB41.2">PB41.2</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (February 18, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council refuse alterations to the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street contains a 3-storey brick row building constructed in 1887. The Brass Rail Tavern has operated at 699 Yonge Street since 1948. Both halves of the commercial row at 699 and 707 Yonge Street have been over-clad, obscuring the original brick walls underneath.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application, the redevelopment proposes a 64-storey plus mechanical penthouse mixed-use building, which retains the façade of the heritage building and incorporates it into the three-storey base of the tower, with a stepback depth of 3 metres from the heritage façade on the Yonge Street (west) elevation.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed 3-metre tower stepback from Yonge Street above the heritage building and the proposed treatment of the front elevation at the ground floor do not adequately conserve the property's cultural heritage values and attributes. Therefore, the proposed Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment does not conform with the policies of the Official Plan and does not conserve the cultural heritage values and attributes of the property at 699 and 707 Yonge Street.</p> |
| 145729 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 171 East Liberty Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register | 2026.TE31.27 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council include 171 East Liberty Street (including structure addresses at 165 – 167 East Liberty Street, 171 East Liberty Street and 37 Hanna Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 171 East Liberty Street is located at the southeast corner of East Liberty Street and Hanna Avenue in the Fort York – Liberty Village neighbourhood. The property is a former factory complex containing three brick buildings constructed in 1942 as the John Inglis Company Bren Gun Assembly and Test Buildings. The site comprises buildings at 171 East Liberty Street (the north structure), 37 Hanna Avenue (the south structure) and 165-167 East Liberty Street (the northeast structure with associated smokestack). The property contributes to an important collection of surviving industrial buildings in Liberty Village. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property are found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.</p> |
| 146001 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 171 East Liberty Street - Inclusion on the Heritage Register | 2026.TE31.27a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on March 30, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB42.1">PB42.1</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (March 13, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council include 171 East Liberty Street (including structure addresses at 165 – 167 East Liberty Street, 171 East Liberty Street and 37 Hanna Avenue) on the City of Toronto's Heritage Register for its cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statement (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 171 East Liberty Street is located at the southeast corner of East Liberty Street and Hanna Avenue in the Fort York – Liberty Village neighbourhood. The property is a former factory complex containing three brick buildings constructed in 1942 as the John Inglis Company Bren Gun Assembly and Test Buildings. The site comprises buildings at 171 East Liberty Street (the north structure), 37 Hanna Avenue (the south structure) and 165-167 East Liberty Street (the northeast structure with associated smokestack). The property contributes to an important collection of surviving industrial buildings in Liberty Village. A location map and current photograph of the heritage property are found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register has been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06 and meets one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and is believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.</p> |
| 145546 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 55800000 | N | 388 Beresford Avenue - Request for a Fence Exemption to the Toronto Municipal Code, Chapter 447 | 2026.TE31.28 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report concerns a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report responds to an application submitted by the property owner of 388 Beresford Avenue requesting approval for a site-specific Fence Exemption under Section 447-1.2B(1) of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 – Fences.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking Council’s permission to maintain an existing wood fence and gate with vertical boards, including its posts, with heights ranging from approximately 2.45 metres to 2.49 metres. The existing fence does not comply with the fence height standards prescribed in Chapter 447, which limit the height of fences in residential areas. Municipal Licensing and Standards staff conducted an inspection and confirmed that the fence exceeds the maximum permitted height for the property. As a result, a Fence Exemption is required for the fence to remain in its current form.</p> | 31 | 28 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145603 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 55800000 | N | 47 Atlas Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption | 2026.TE31.29 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 47 Atlas Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447, Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 47 Atlas Avenue is requesting an exemption for their;</p>
<p><br />- Existing wooden board on board fence to remain</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Rear fence – Southern lot line fence height of 2.7 meters at a length of 12.5 metres</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Rear fence – Eastern lot line fence height of 2.48 meters at a length of 7.3 metres</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Rear fence – Northern lot line fence height of 2.37 meters at a length of 12.5 metres</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447 Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.</p> | 31 | 29 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145512 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 55800000 | N | 11 Lynwood Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption | 2026.TE31.30 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 11 Lynwood Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447, Section 1.2.B(1) fence in rear yard not to exceed 2.0 metres in height.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 11 Lynwood Avenue is requesting an exemption for their;</p>
<p>- Proposed rear yard fence to be constructed </p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Rear Yard fencing/barrier: Height of 2.37 metres at a length of 7.8 metres</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Constructed with steel posts and masonry concrete blocks</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Rear Yard Fence separating driveway from backyard: height of 2.37 metres at a length of 12.3 metres</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Constructed with steel vertical members</p> | 31 | 30 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated |
| 145416 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 114 Ossington Avenue - Encroachment Appeal | 2026.TE31.31 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 114 Ossington Avenue regarding an encroachment application for a natural gas-fuelled fire pit installed within the public right-of-way, which is in contravention of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking authority from Toronto and East York Community Council to permit the continued maintenance of the natural gas-fuelled fire pit within the public right-of-way. Transportation Services does not recommend that authority be granted.</p> | 31 | 31 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145678 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 666 Spadina Avenue - Encroachment Appeal - Walkway Platform and Bollards | 2026.TE31.32 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 666 Spadina Avenue regarding their encroachment application. The proposed walkway platform and bollards do not comply with City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of, which permits only soft landscaping within 0.50 metres of the edge of sidewalk located closest to the street line.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking authorization from the Toronto and East York Community Council to construct and maintain a walkway platform and two bollards within the public right-of-way at 666 Spadina Avenue, despite this proposal being in contravention of the Toronto Municipal Code. The proposed installation would maintain a minimum pedestrian clearway of 2.10 to 4.68 metres on the adjacent sidewalk, meeting the required minimum of 2.10 metres for permitted encroachments.</p> | 31 | 32 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145417 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 33 Yorkville Avenue - Noise Exemption Permit Refusal Appeal | 2026.TE31.33 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The matter before the Community Council is an appeal application for a noise exemption permit submitted by PEM (Yorkville) Holdings Inc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The project, located at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-56 Cumberland Street, Toronto, also known as Concord Canada House, is a 72-storey condominium with 1397 Units.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The noise exemption permit was requested to conduct construction of a mixed-use residential and commercial development consisting of a 46-storey and 69-storey residential building above a commercial podium containing above-grade residential parking and retail, and below-grade commercial parking garage for Toronto Parking Authority.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application was refused by Municipal Licensing and Standards (ML&S) on the basis of the Ward Councillor's objection. The permit was inadvertently sent to the applicant and was later clarified and reverted in accordance with the Ward Councillor's objection. The applicant has appealed the refusal. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As required for the appeal process, this staff report provides information to assist in the decision making for which Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision, namely a final decision under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 591, Noise (Noise By-law) to either grant or refuse a noise exemption permit application given the appeal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If the Community Council grants the noise exemption permit application, it is subject to the conditions set out in § 591-3.2.D of the Noise By-law, unless the Community Council determines otherwise, and to any other conditions respecting health, safety and nuisance as the Community Council considers advisable.</p> |
| 145673 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management | 2026.TE31.34 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to appoint and remove directors from the boards of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) that fall within its geographic boundaries.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to make changes to the Cabbagetown, Korea Town, The Junction and The Waterfront Business Improvement Area Boards of Management, in accordance with the requirement of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas.</p> | 31 | 34 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 145754 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Quayside Infrastructure and Public Realm Project (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE31.35 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As Queens Quay East is a major arterial road, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Waterfront Toronto is delivering development enabling infrastructure and public space in the Quayside precinct bounded by Lake Shore Boulevard to the north, Bonnycastle Street to the west, Lake Ontario to the south and the Victory Soya Mills Silos to the east under the Quayside Infrastructure and Public Realm (QIPR) project. The QIPR project will realign Parliament Street, extend Queens Quay east to the Silos, normalize the Parliament Street and Queens Quay East intersection, deliver necessary servicing connections and improve Bonnycastle Street and Small Street. The QIPR implementation will unlock development parcels that include commitments for affordable housing and deliver much needed public realm improvements to the area. As a result, there will be a realignment and lane reconfiguration of Queens Quay East, from Lower Sherbourne Street to Parliament Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At its meeting on May 21, 2025, City Council authorized the:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Temporary closure of the north sidewalk and a portion of the westbound curb lane on Queens Quay East, between Small Street and Bonnycastle Street; and</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Temporary closure of Small Street to all road users, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and Queens Quay East for a period of 16 months, from June 2, 2025 to October 4, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The delivery of servicing connections and improvements to Small Street are currently underway. The next phase of construction includes the realignment of Parliament Street and extension of Queens Quay East which requires the closure of the Martin Goodman Trail in the vicinity of Parliament Street to accommodate the construction of the new roadways and associated public realm. As a result, a temporary and protected bi-direction bicycle lane will be implemented in the existing boulevard area of the northbound curb lane on Parliament Street. The existing pedestrian sidewalk on the east side of Parliament Street will continue to be maintained. Under the existing staging plan, vehicle lane capacity will be maintained with no changes required</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Due to a delay in the Release for Construction and changes in scope for the work, the existing construction staging on Small Street and Queens Quay are required to be extended to complete the works in those areas.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Therefore, Transportation Services is requesting authorization for the following:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Temporary detour of the Martin Goodman Trail on Parliament Street, between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East and;</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Temporary closure of the east side boulevard on Parliament Street between Merchant's Wharf and Lake Shore Boulevard East and the provision of a temporary bi-direction bicycle lane for a period of 9 months between April 22, 2026 and December 31, 2026</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Extension of the existing temporary closure of the north sidewalk and a portion of the westbound curb lane on Queens Quay East, between Small Street and Bonnycastle Street from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026; and</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Extension of the existing temporary closure of Small Street to all road users, between Lake Shore Boulevard East and Queens Quay East from October 4, 2026 to December 31, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As there are no changes to vehicle lane capacity, a new traffic impact study has not been conducted.</p> |
| 145717 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Yorkville Avenue and Cumberland Street (33 Yorkville Avenue and 50 Cumberland Street) - Construction Staging Area Time Extension | 2026.TE31.36 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>PEM (Yorkville) Holdings Inc. has undertaken the construction of a 68-storey mixed-used development and a 42-story residential condominium building at 33 Yorkville Avenue and 50 Cumberland Street, respectively. The south sidewalk and a portion of the eastbound curb lane on Yorkville Avenue, and the north sidewalk and a portion of the eastbound lane on Cumberland Street is currently closed for construction staging operations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>By way of background, Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on February 5, 2020, approved the subject construction staging area on Yorkville Avenue and Cumberland Street from March 1, 2020 to May 31, 2024.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At a later Toronto and East York Community Council meeting on July 10, 2024, the developer requested an extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Yorkville Avenue and on Cumberland Street. The extension request was due to delays caused by transfer of ownership that impacted the original construction schedule and onsite construction activities did not start until February 2021. At the meeting, although the developer has proposed an extension to be in effect from August 1, 2024 until February 1, 2027, the Council instead authorized a reduced period, concluding on January 31, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The developer is now requesting an extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Yorkville Avenue and on Cumberland Street, to allow for the construction of the development to be completed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It should be noted that the project schedule has been accelerated, allowing the construction staging to be removed from sidewalk and the roadway one month earlier on December 31, 2026. The previous target end date was February 1, 2027.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In view of the above, Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Yorkville Avenue and on Cumberland Street for an additional 11 months, from February 1, 2026 to December 31, 2026.</p> |
| 145769 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 289-299 Balliol Street - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE31.37 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Menkes Balliol Inc. is constructing a 31-storey residential rental building at 289-299 Balliol Street. The site is located on the south side of Balliol Street, between Mount Pleasant Road and Pailton Crescent.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the eastbound curb lane and the south sidewalk on Balliol Street for a period of 15 months, from April 2, 2026 to June 30, 2027, in order to enable construction staging operations for the development. Pedestrians will be redirected into a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the eastbound lane on the south side of Balliol Street.</p> | 31 | 37 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated |
| 145794 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 49 Ontario Street (Phase 1) - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE31.38 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As Adelaide Street East is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>DCC 49 Ontario Inc. is constructing two rental towers including affordable housing at 49 Ontario Street. The site is located on the north side of Adelaide Street East, between Ontario Street and Berkeley Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Construction will be undertaken in two phases with varying degrees of sidewalk and lane closures taking place on Ontario Street, Adelaide Street East, and Berkeley Street. This report deals with the matters related to Phase 1 (below grade construction). Phase 2 (above grade construction) will be discussed in a future staff report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the following:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- The north sidewalk and the northerly eastbound cycle track on Adelaide Street East, for a period of 18 months from April 23, 2026 to September 30, 2027; and</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- The east boulevard allowance and full sidewalk closure on Ontario Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pedestrians on the north side of Adelaide Street East will be redirected to cross to the south side at the traffic control signals located at the intersections of Adelaide Street East with Ontario Street and Berkeley Street. Advance warning signage will be installed upstream at the intersection of Richmond Street East and Berkeley Street. Due to the density of residential buildings and businesses on Ontario Street, a temporary pedestrian crossover will be installed to facilitate safe pedestrian crossings.</p> | 31 | 38 |
| 145768 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 53-55 Yonge Street - Construction Staging Area Time Extension | 2026.TE31.39 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As Yonge Street is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>H&R REIT is demolishing the properties at 53 and 55 Yonge Street in preparation for a future development. The site is located on the east side of Yonge Street, between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, City Council authorized the:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Temporary closure of a portion of the east sidewalk and northbound curb lane of Yonge Street between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street, for a period of 10 months, from July 28, 2025 to May 1, 2026; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Temporary closure of a portion of the south sidewalk and eastbound curb lane on Colborne Street between Yonge Street and Scott Street, for a period of 10 months, from July 28, 2025 to May 1, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The above noted construction staging area overlaps with the existing staging by the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Easier Access project for the King Station until May 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Due to delays in establishing construction staging area delineation between the two constructors, the construction start date was delayed and a time extension is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>TTC has confirmed that the TTC Easier Access project for the King Station is expected to be complete by May 1, 2026. Therefore, the developer has requested to adjust the existing staging area for the demolition work after May 1, 2026, once TTC has demobilized and removed their existing construction staging. The result is that the developer will take over a portion of the existing TTC construction staging area so that the existing footprint is no longer shared between both constructors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pedestrians will continue to be redirected from the east side of Yonge Street to the opposite sidewalk. Pedestrian movements on the south side of Colborne Street will be redirected to the north side.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization for the following:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Extension of the temporary closure of a portion of the east sidewalk and northbound curb lane of Yonge Street between Wellington Street East and Colborne Street, for a period of three months, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Extension of the temporary closure of a portion of the south sidewalk and eastbound curb lane on Colborne Street between Yonge Street and Scott Street for a period of three months, from May 1, 2026 to July 31, 2026.</p> |
| 145679 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Temporary Street Closure of Bremner Boulevard for the Toronto Maple Leafs and Toronto Raptors 2026 Playoff Season | 2026.TE31.40 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to temporarily close Bremner Boulevard between Lake Shore Boulevard West and a point east of the parking garage accesses servicing 15 and 25 York Street respectively, from April 7, 2026 to July 6, 2026 to facilitate the Maple Leafs Sports and Entertainment's viewing area for the Toronto Maple Leafs and Toronto Raptors 2026 playoff season.</p> | 31 | 40 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 145700 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Market Street - Temporary Street Closure | 2026.TE31.41 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council does not have delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to temporarily close Market Street to vehicular traffic between The Esplanade and Front Street East from May 10, 2026, to January 9, 2027. This temporary closure is required to facilitate the Market Street Closure hosted by the Old Town Toronto BIA.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Given that Transportation Services does not have the authority to close a road for longer than four (4) days, approval from City Council is required in accordance with Section 937-3 of Municipal Code Chapter 937, Temporary Closing of Highways.</p> | 31 | 41 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council |
| 145767 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Charles Street West - Two-Way Operation | 2026.TE31.42 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval of the rescission of the one-way westbound operation of Charles Street West, between Balmuto Street and Yonge Street, as well as associated parking amendments. The two-way conversion of Charles Street West is feasible and is supported by the community. The conversion will enhance the connectivity of the area road network and will promote slower operating speeds.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered discrepancies between the by-lawed parking regulations and the posted signage on Charles Street West. Recommendation 7 will rectify this inconsistency.</p> | 31 | 42 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated |
| 145759 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Ontario Place Event (RBC Amphitheatre - Formerly Budweiser Stage) Traffic Management Strategy | 2026.TE31.43 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on September 18, 2025, Toronto and East York Community Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back in the first quarter of 2026 on trial traffic mitigation measures for special events held on Ontario Place grounds.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The event organizer (Live Nation) is responsible for developing and implementing a traffic management plan to manage the high volume of vehicular and pedestrian traffic during their events, minimize impacts on the surrounding road network, and ensure safety of the patrons attending their events.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services, Ontario Place, Exhibition Place, Municipal Licensing and Standards, Toronto Police Services (TPS) and other relevant partners support Live Nation's traffic management strategies.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report provides a summary of the traffic mitigation measures that were implemented as part of a pilot project, tested on September 27 and 28, 2025. A discussion of the effectiveness of the pilot, and traffic mitigation measures that are to be utilized for future events are also included in this report.</p> | 31 | 43 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report |
| 145418 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Traffic Management in Ward 14 related to the King Street East and Church Street Intersection Project | 2026.TE31.44 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On April 23 and 24, 2025, City Council directed Transportation Services in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council with information on how the TTC tracks and watermain at King Street East and Church Street degraded to the point of requiring repair and associated diversion, and the ongoing active traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue, and Gerrard Street East, including a specific update on actions taken, and additional recommendations at Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to provide an explanation as to why the work at King Street East and Church Street was scheduled for 2025, and to provide a summary of the ongoing and planned traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue and Gerrard Street East, including additional recommendations for the intersection of Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p> | 31 | 44 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145419 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Vehicle Width Restriction - Public Lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and Public Lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East | 2026.TE31.45 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is seeking authority to prohibit vehicles greater than two metres in width from travelling on the lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and the lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East. Prohibiting vehicles which have a width of two metres or more from travelling in the subject lane sections would be beneficial in reducing the incidence of damage to the surrounding private properties.</p> | 31 | 45 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145750 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Vehicle Width Restriction - Public Lane System bounded by Beaver Avenue, Lightbourn Avenue, Brandon Avenue, and Primrose Avenue | 2026.TE31.46 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is seeking authority to prohibit vehicles greater than two metres in width from travelling on the public lane system bounded by Beaver Avenue, Lightbourn Avenue, Brandon Avenue, and Primrose Avenue. Prohibiting vehicles which have a width of two metres or more from travelling in the subject lane system would be beneficial in reducing the incidence of damage to the surrounding infrastructure and private properties.</p> | 31 | 46 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 145440 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | REFERRED | — | N | Safety Improvements on Davenport Road, Cottingham Road, Poplar Plains Road, and Macpherson Avenue | 2026.TE31.47 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report seeks Community Council approval for several traffic operations changes and bylaw amendments to improve safety along Davenport Road, Cottingham Road, Poplar Plains Road, and Macpherson Avenue. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed design includes safety improvements to two intersections and one mid-block change as listed below:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Poplar Plains Road between Cottingham Road and Boulton Drive: several proposed amendments to facilitate a new parking lane along the west side of Poplar Plains Road between Cottingham Road and Boulton Drive.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Davenport Road and Glen Edyth Drive and Cottingham Road: installation of a compulsory stop control southbound on Glen Edyth Drive at Cottingham Road to facilitate the realignment of this intersection.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Davenport Road and Poplar Plains Road and Macpherson Avenue: installation of traffic control signals and rescinding the existing westbound compulsory right-turn only limitation to create a normalized four-leg intersection with most movements (left-turn, right-turn and through) permitted. The existing southbound left-turn prohibition would remain due to geometric constraints. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Together, the proposed changes would improve safety though clear direction for people driving through intersections and would support new safe connections and crossings for pedestrians and people cycling. </p> | 31 | 47 |
| 145736 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Spaces - April 2026 (Delegated) | 2026.TE31.48 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation and removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.</p> | 31 | 48 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 145737 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Spaces - April 2026 (Non-Delegated) | 2026.TE31.49 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on the subject streets, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.</p> | 31 | 49 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 145764 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Archer Street - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE31.50 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending prohibiting standing on both sides of the north/south leg of Archer Street, between Cobourg Avenue and the east/west leg of Archer Street. The proposed changes will deter parking at this location and improve safety and traffic operations by maintaining unobstructed sightlines and a clear passage for vehicles on the two-way street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered inconsistencies in the traffic by-law related to the current signed parking regulations on Archer Street and Coburg Avenue. Recommendations 2 to 5 will rectify these inconsistencies.</p> | 31 | 50 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145749 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Bayview Avenue - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE31.51 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bayview Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending that the existing stopping prohibition within the exclusive right-turn lane on the west side of Bayview Avenue, between Front Street East and Lawren Harris Square (south leg), be changed to a standing prohibition. The proposed amendment will allow motorists, including TTC buses at an existing transit stop, to pick-up/drop-off passengers.</p> | 31 | 51 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 145741 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Westview Boulevard - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE31.52 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report is about parking regulations for which the Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending parking prohibitions on Westview Boulevard at the following intersections:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Amsterdam Avenue</p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Galbraith Avenue</p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Tiago Avenue</p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Selwyn Avenue</p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Gardens Crescent</p>
<p>- Westview Boulevard at Joanith Drive</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending the proposed parking prohibitions to support the implementation of geometric safety improvements and maintain vehicle maneuverability at these intersections, which were identified for delivery through the City's Transportation Safety and Local Improvements Program and the City's state-of-good-repair program.</p> | 31 | 52 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 145770 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Traffic and Parking Amendments - Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Traction Power Upgrade Project | 2026.TE31.53 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Yonge Street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City Council, at its meeting on July 23 and 24, 2025, adopted Item 2025.IE23.5, and in doing so, authorized delegated authority to temporarily close vehicular and pedestrian traffic any highway or portion of highway, with the exception of those highways listed in Section 937-4 of Code Chapter 937, as required for the purpose of construction of the Traction Power Upgrade Project contract number S75-7.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The TTC Traction Power Upgrade program involves critical upgrades to TTC’s traction power substations (TPSS), necessary to support the power demands for increased train service and expanded subway station capacity. To upgrade its TPSS infrastructure, TTC needs to upgrade and install new electrification and servicing infrastructure within the public right-of-way.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Granby Traction Power Substation (TPSS) and Duct Bank Replacement Project is the first project to commence construction within the larger Traction Power Upgrade program. Contract S75-7 involves upgrades to the existing TPSS facility, located on Granby Street between Yonge Street and Church Street. The work requires the replacement of duct banks within the right-of-way to install the required electrical infrastructure needed to provide power to the TTC subway system.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To facilitate construction staging operations, McGill Parkette and Sheard Street, from Granby Street to McGill Street will be temporarily closed to all vehicular traffic. As a result of this full closure, the existing one-way eastbound and westbound traffic operations on McGill Street and Granby Street, respectively, will be temporarily converted to a two-way traffic operation to maintain local access and egress. In addition, the parking machine spaces on Granby Street and McGill Street will be temporarily removed to accommodate 24/7 permit parking operations, to mitigate the traffic and construction impacts to the neighborhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Furthermore, the businesses fronting on Yonge Street, with rear access from Sheard Street, will not be able to access Sheard Street to load and unload deliveries. In order to accommodate deliveries, a temporary loading zone will be designated on the east side of Yonge Street, between a point 91 metres south of Carlton Street and a point 41 metres further south.</p> |
| 145721 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | — | N | Lake Shore Boulevard East - Mid-Block Pedestrian and Cyclist Traffic Control Signal and Public Realm Improvements | 2026.TE31.54 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is providing an update on plans to construct a multi-use trail connection along Lake Shore Boulevard East to close a gap in the Lake Shore Boulevard East Trail between Cherry Street and the Don River bridge, and seeking authority to install a necessary pedestrian and cyclist traffic control signal on Lake Shore Boulevard East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also responds to City Council's request on November 12 and 13, 2025 for a report on public realm improvement plans along Lake Shore Boulevard East, between Carlaw Avenue and Leslie Street.</p> | 31 | 54 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main | — |
| 145762 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Bay Street and Edward Street - Traffic Control Signals | 2026.TE31.55 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Bay Street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to install traffic control signals at the intersection of Bay Street and Edward Street. The traffic control signals will provide enhanced safety for all road users and is justified based on the assessment undertaken.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered discrepancies between the by-lawed parking regulations and the posted signage on Edward Street. Recommendation 4 will rectify this inconsistency.</p> | 31 | 55 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council |
| 145740 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Mid-Block Pedestrian Traffic Control Signal - Jarvis Street, between Carlton Street and Maitland Street/Maitland Place | 2026.TE31.56 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services has reviewed the need for pedestrian crossing protection on Jarvis Street, between Carlton Street and Maitland Street/Maitland Place. Based on the assessment undertaken, Transportation Services is recommending the installation of a mid-block traffic control signal on Jarvis Street, approximately 190 metres north of Carlton Street. The mid-block traffic control signal will provide enhanced safety for all road users, particularly vulnerable road users.</p> | 31 | 56 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 145735 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Labatt Avenue - Pedestrian Way Designation and Streetscape Improvements | 2026.TE31.57 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>1-25 Defries Street is being redeveloped as a 37-storey condominium building. As part of Section 37 Agreement dated September 9, 2020, the developer is required to develop parkland at 1 Defries Street and provide streetscape improvements along Labatt Avenue from Defries Street to the end of paved portion of the roadway. These planned improvements will extend the parkland into the adjacent dead-end portion of Labatt Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to designate the section of Labatt Avenue between a point 17.0 metres east of Defries Street to a point 23.8 metres further east (dead-end) as a Pedestrian Way. Labatt Avenue is currently classified as a local roadway. The proposed designation as a Pedestrian Way would prohibit access to motor vehicle traffic, while continuing to allow access to pedestrians and people cycling, emergency and maintenance vehicles. This change would establish a seamless, pedestrian-oriented connection between the new parkland and the adjacent portion of Labatt Avenue.</p> | 31 | 57 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … |
| 145739 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | REFERRED | — | N | Dockside Drive and Knapp Lane - All-Way Stop Control | 2026.TE31.58 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to install all-way stop control at the intersection of Dockside Drive and Knapp Lane. Based on the assessment undertaken, the installation of all-way stop control is recommended and should enhance safety for all road users.</p> | 31 | 58 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Referred | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 145699 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Gamble Avenue - Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) | 2026.TE31.59 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending the installation of speed humps on Gamble Avenue, between Pape Avenue and Donlands Avenue. Staff's assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has been satisfied. Therefore, speed humps should be installed on Gamble Avenue.</p> | 31 | 59 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 145782 | REPORT | N | Y | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Appointment of Public Members to the Moss Park Arena Board | 2026.TE31.60 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>City Council has authorized the City Clerk to shortlist, interview and recommend candidates to Community Councils for appointment to the Moss Park Arena Board. This report recommends two candidates for appointment to the board.</p> | 31 | 60 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … |
| 145745 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Exclusion of Bloor-Dufferin from On-Street Residential Permit Parking | 2026.TE31.61 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am requesting that the development at the Bloor-Dufferin site be excluded fron the on-street permit parking program.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Excluding new developments from on-street permit parking helps manage the parking supply and encourages residents to adopt more sustainable transportation options such as walking, cycling, and transit. This aligns with the City’s broader goals to reduce congestion and lower emissions, and the expectation that all new developments provide parking to address the demand they generate.</p> | 31 | 61 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … |
| 145720 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Re-Opening and Amending Item TE24.61 - Brock Avenue - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE31.62 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>An incorrect parking amendment was included in an item for Brock Avenue that was adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council at its meeting on July 8, 2025. The recommendations below will correct this error while maintaining the parking changes requested by Brock Avenue residents.</p> | 31 | 62 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 145574 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Ossington Street Parking and Traffic Review | 2026.TE31.63 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Transportation Services and Deputy Mayor Malik are considering changes to Ossington between Dundas Street and Queen Street, which will allow parking 24/7 on both sides, add pedestrian bump outs, and reduce live traffic to one lane in each direction. These changes will have knock on effect on Ossington Street traffic north of Dundas Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Some residents in the area north of Dundas Street have also requested that parking be permitted during rush-hour in order to provide a safety buffer between pedestrians and moving vehicles, particularly in the vicinity of schools.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In light of the changes being made to Ossington Street south of Dundas Street, and after consultation with Councillor Bravo, I request Transportation Services to review whether any traffic, sidewalk and parking changes ought to be made on Ossington Street between Dupont Street and Dundas Street.</p> | 31 | 63 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 145926 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Establishing a Commercial Loading Zone on Salem Avenue | 2026.TE31.64 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Earlier this year, I joined local residents and business owners near Salem Avenue and Bloor Street West for a neighbourhood walk to discuss parking issues impacting the community. I heard directly from residents who shared challenges with delivery vehicles using laneways to load and unload products, and from business owners who raised concerns about the lack of commercial loading zones in the area. <br /> <br /> Transportation Services conducted a review of commercial loading zone options in the surrounding area. City staff identified a section of Salem Avenue, just north of Bloor Street West, that can accommodate a loading zone for businesses. As a result of this new loading zone, parking will be relocated to the west side of Salem Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The creation of this commercial loading zone will deter illegal parking, clear access for drivers in the laneway, and support local businesses receiving deliveries.</p> | 31 | 64 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New |
| 145977 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Re-opening and Amending TE25.42 - Accessible Parking Spaces | 2026.TE31.65 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At the September 18, 2025 meeting of Toronto and East York Community Council, an accessible parking space was approved on Gladstone Avenue. The original applicant recently notified Transportation Services that this accessible parking space is no longer required.<br /> <br /> As a year has not passed since the adoption of this item, a motion is required to re-open and rescind installation of this accessible parking space on Gladstone Avenue.</p> | 31 | 65 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 146026 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Mirvish Village - Parking and Traffic Amendments (Delegated) | 2026.TE31.66 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Mirvish Village Redevelopment includes properties municipally known as 571-597 Bloor St W, 742-754 and 760-782 Bathurst St, 26-38 Lennox Street, and 581-603 and 588-612 Markham Street with frontage on Bloor Street W, Bathurst Street, Lennox Street, and Markham Street. The owner of the project is Westbank Project Corp, and the corresponding site plan application no 17 187476 STE 19 SA. The proposed mixed-use development includes several mid-rise and tall buildings, ranging from 2 storeys to 27 storeys.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This motion is to implement components of the approved 2021 site plan agreement with Westbank Project Corp.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development includes public realm improvement consisting of expanding the boulevard on Markham Street by narrowing down the travelled portion of the roadway for a one-way operation. Furthermore, a private east-west driveway under public vehicular easement has been established south of Bloor Street West, between Bathurst Street and Markham Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The required parking and traffic amendments on Markham Street, between Lennox Street and Bloor Street West, are as follows:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- This roadway will operate in a one-way northbound direction.</p>
<p>- Stopping will be prohibited at all times on the east side of the street</p>
<p>- On the west side of the street, curbside activities will only be permitted within two constructed lay-bys. A 10-minute delivery zone that will operate at all times is recommended in one lay-by, and a Passenger Loading Zone that will also operate at all times is recommended for the other lay-by.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>These traffic and parking amendments will address requirements of the site plan agreement for the newly developed mixed-used development (Mirvish Village) on Markham Street. The amendments will meet new street configurations and operational needs for the corridor. The implementation will accommodate anticipated pedestrian and vehicular volumes while providing a safe environment for all users.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The completion of construction and traffic access on Markham Street is scheduled for the middle of April 2026. As a standard condition of a development site plan approval process, the applicant must contact Transportation Services six months prior to completion for staff to prepare the necessary report to Community Council for by-law approval of traffic and parking amendments. This by-law approval is being expedited because this condition was not included in the site plan application process by Development Review.</p> |
| 146027 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Mirvish Village - Traffic Amendments (Non-Delegated) | 2026.TE31.67 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Mirvish Village Redevelopment includes properties municipally known as 571-597 Bloor St W, 742-754 and 760-782 Bathurst St, 26-38 Lennox Street, and 581-603 and 588-612 Markham Street with frontage on Bloor Street W, Bathurst Street, Lennox Street, and Markham Street. The owner of the project is Westbank Project Corp, and the corresponding site plan application no 17 187476 STE 19 SA. The proposed mixed-use development includes several mid-rise and tall buildings, ranging from 2 storeys to 27 storeys.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This motion is to implement components of the approved 2021 site plan agreement with Westbank Project Corp. The following are the required turn prohibitions that will operate at all times:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street – _Southbound right-turns</p>
<p>- Bathurst Street and the private driveway at 758 Bathurst Street – _Northbound left-turns</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As part of this new development, Markham Street, between Lennox Street and Bloor Street West, will operate one-way in a northbound direction. This development will also incorporate a new private east-west driveway located south of Bloor Steet West, between Markham Street and Bathurst Street. This private driveway will operate one-way in an eastbound direction. The implementations of these turning prohibitions will help reinforce the designated traffic operation surrounding the new mixed-use development (Mirvish Village) and will help deter motorist from making unsafe turns.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The completion of construction and traffic access on Markham Street is scheduled for the middle of April 2026. As a standard condition of a development site plan approval process, the applicant must contact Transportation Services six months prior to completion for staff to prepare the necessary report to Community Council for by-law approval of traffic and parking amendments. This by-law approval is being expedited because this condition was not included in the site plan application process by Development Review.</p> |
| 145941 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Plan for Joe Pantalone Lane | 2026.TE31.68 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Joe Pantalone is a well-loved Canadian politician who served on <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toronto_City_Council">Toronto City Council</a> and <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metropolitan_Toronto">Metro Council</a> from 1980 to 2010. Pantalone was the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deputy_Mayor_of_Toronto">deputy mayor of Toronto</a> from 2003 to 2010, and represented the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity-Bellwoods">Trinity</a> area as a councillor.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Little Italy Business Improvement Association has requested that the Public Lane West of Grace Street, extending between Harbord Street and Grace Street north of College Street, be renamed as Joe Pantalone Lane.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The necessary public notice has not yet been given.</p> | 31 | 68 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — |
| 146022 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Price Street Loading Zone | 2026.TE31.69 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Price Street is a short narrow street running east from Yonge Street that dead ends at the Toronto Lawn and Tennis Club. There are significant safety issues with garbage pick up and deliveries to the club, including large trucks frequently driving up on the sidewalk while children are walking to their lessons. In addition, the club has just commenced a significant renovation to make the premises wheelchair accessible. The addition of heavy construction vehicles to the pre-existing safety challenges on this very short narrow street has made it essential to convert some of the existing on street parking into a commercial loading zone.</p> | 31 | 69 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 146015 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Davies Avenue and Carroll Street - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE31.70 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Queen Street Watermain and TTC Track Replacement project has required the temporary removal of 25 paid parking spaces between Davies and Broadview Avenues to support construction staging and traffic management. The area has already faced significant parking, and traffic impacts due to earlier emergency watermain work. Through <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.TE27.81">TE27.81</a> and <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.TE28.54">TE28.54</a> , temporary parking spots were installed on Davies Avenue and Carroll Street. I recently received interest from affected residents, as well as a letter from the local BIA requesting that the temporary parking on these streets be made permanent following the completion of this construction project.</p> | 31 | 70 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 146033 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Camberwell Road - Parking and Traffic Amendments | 2026.TE31.71 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to remove three parking spots and install a “No Standing” zone on the west side of Camberwell Road, between Eglinton Avenue West and a point 41 metres further south.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Like many streets in the proximity of the Eglinton Avenue West and Allen Road intersection, Camberwell Road experiences significant congestion during peak travel times. The three parking spots currently designated on the west side of Camberwell prevent the simultaneous movement of left and right-hand turning vehicles onto Eglinton, contributing to a bottle neck which extends throughout the neighbourhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Camberwell residents have reached out to my office requesting the removal of these parking spots as a means of easing the congestion along their street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Following the redesign of the Eglinton Avenue West and Allen Road intersection and improvements to traffic flow in the neighbourhood, our office would be pleased to assess the feasibility of re-introducing parking at this location.</p> | 31 | 71 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION |
| 146018 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Implementation of a Commercial Loading Zone on Queen Street East | 2026.TE31.72 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Reconstruction of the laneway located on the east side of Jones Avenue, approximately 23 metres north of Queen Street East will commence in May. This laneway is the primary loading zone for many businesses on Queen Street East, east of Jones Avenue. The installation of a temporary loading zone on Queen Street East is important for businesses to continue their commercial activities during this construction period.</p> | 31 | 72 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | — | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 146042 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Building New Infrastructure in Liberty Village by Advancing Liberty New Street in Alignment with the Opening of Exhibition Station | 2026.TE31.73 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>It’s critical to continue to address traffic congestion in Liberty Village and ensure local residents can navigate their neighbourhood safely and reliably. Transportation Services staff continue to iterate upon my Liberty Village Traffic Action Plan, initially advanced in the summer of 2024, to meet this objective.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An enduring commitment to the community over many years has been the promise of a new road: a new east/west connection for this growing neighbourhood. This new road has long been necessary to address the longstanding and considerable congestion pressures from vehicles and transit alike on East Liberty/Liberty Street, the only road connecting this community’s residents and local businesses that call it home. It’s also a key corridor for visitors from across the City enjoying games and activities at nearby BMO Field, Coca Coliseum, Rogers Stadium, and Exhibition Place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I continue to engage with Metrolinx and City staff to convey how vital it is that this new infrastructure is delivered alongside new transformational transit as part of the Ontario Line. And, as the province looks to build Transit Oriented Communities, we are welcoming new residents to this community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I’m committed to ensuring that we continue to move forward this important piece of infrastructure, and holding Metrolinx accountable to our shared commitment of making sure that this new road is ready for when Exhibition Station opens.</p> | 31 | 73 |
| 145999 | DFTBYLAW | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Introduction of By-laws | 2026.TE31.74 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council will introduce bills.</p> | 31 | 74 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | — | Draft By-law | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … |