| 143764 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | N | Naming of a Public Lane Located West of Claremont Street, extending between Mansfield Avenue and Treford Place | 2025.TE27.1 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that the name "Love You More Lane" be approved to identify the naming of a public lane located west of Claremont Street, extending between Mansfield Avenue and Treford Place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/">https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/</a>.</p> | 27 | 1 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ACTION | true | Adopted | 9:30 AM | … | … | … | … | — | — | — | — | — |
| 143787 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 138 Dowling Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.2 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 16 storey apartment building with 145 units at 138 Dowling Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City’s Official Plan. Staff recommend approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law.</p> | 27 | 2 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 143805 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 1 Front Street West - Official Plan Amendment and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.3 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit an increase in residential gross floor area and a reduction in non-residential gross floor area including office floor area within the development previously approved at 1 Front Street West. The proposal is to permit residential uses within a portion of the west tower currently approved for non-residential uses. The application also proposes modifications to the north façade of the Dominion Public Building, a heritage building, with fourteen of the windows proposed to be lowered to provide additional views and access to the retail spaces proposed within the building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The site was the subject of a previous Official Plan and Zoning By-law amendment application approved by the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) in 2020. The final order was issued by the OLT in 2022 bringing OPA 507 (By-law 1250-2022 (OLT)) and the amending Zoning By-laws into force and effect (By-law 1251-2022 (OLT) and By-law 1252-2022 (OLT)), and subject to the former Section 37 of the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>No changes are proposed to the previously approved heights, building envelopes or setbacks of the two towers and no change is proposed to the overall gross floor area permitted on the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed changes to the development are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conform to the Official Plan. The proposal conserves a significant heritage building, continues to provide for a contextually appropriate built form, includes public realm enhancements, proposes a mix of uses that supports housing and employment objectives, including the replacement of office and non-residential uses, and provides for a new community agency space as an additional benefit pursuant to former Section 37 of the Planning Act. Staff recommend that Council approve the application.</p> |
| 143699 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 1 Front Street West - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.4 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage property located at 1 Front Street West under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act at the Dominion Public Building, in connection with a proposed redevelopment of the subject property and that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 1 Front Street West is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and is also contained within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Plan. The Dominion Public Building at 1 Front Street West is identified as a "contributing building" within the Plan.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A related Zoning By-law amendment application proposes amendments to the scheme that was approved in 2020 to permit changes to the permitted uses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The current Heritage Permit application is largely the same as the scheme that was approved in 2020. The only difference is that now modifications are being proposed to 14 of the 18 existing openings on the Front Street façade. The 7 central windows on each wing flanking the central entrance block would be lowered to allow access to the new retail units on the first floor. The modifications will enhance pedestrian access and permeability between the public realm and interior of the property while retaining some original windows, the building’s heavy stone base and its symmetrical form. All other aspects of the conservation strategy that was approved in 2020 are still proposed including restoration of the canopy that once ran the length of the south façade of the building.</p> |
| 143939 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 1 Front Street West -Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.4a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.4">PB37.4</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (November 7, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> <br />This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the heritage property located at 1 Front Street West under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act at the Dominion Public Building, in connection with a proposed redevelopment of the subject property and that Council grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the subject property.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 1 Front Street West is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and is also contained within the Union Station Heritage Conservation District Plan. The Dominion Public Building at 1 Front Street West is identified as a "contributing building" within the Plan.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A related Zoning By-law amendment application proposes amendments to the scheme that was approved in 2020 to permit changes to the permitted uses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The current Heritage Permit application is largely the same as the scheme that was approved in 2020. The only difference is that now modifications are being proposed to 14 of the 18 existing openings on the Front Street façade. The 7 central windows on each wing flanking the central entrance block would be lowered to allow access to the new retail units on the first floor. The modifications will enhance pedestrian access and permeability between the public realm and interior of the property while retaining some original windows, the building’s heavy stone base and its symmetrical form. All other aspects of the conservation strategy that was approved in 2020 are still proposed including restoration of the canopy that once ran the length of the south façade of the building.</p> |
| 143831 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | 257-259 and 291 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 2 Small Street and 200 Queens Quay East (Quayside Blocks 1 and 2) - Zoning By-law Amendment and Part Lot Control Exemption Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.5 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend former City of Toronto Zoning By-law 438-86, as previously amended by By-law 852-2024 and By-law 1049-2006, to modify the zoning permissions of the first two blocks of the Quayside proposal, at 257-259 and 291 Lake Shore Boulevard East, 2 Small Street, and 200 Queens Quay East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Approval of the application would permit two towers rather than one on the north-westerly block (Block 1A) and allow the linear 12-storey building fronting Queens Quay East to be broken up into two buildings. This would result in four mixed-use towers of 50, 57, 66 and 53 storeys, fronting on to Lake Shore Boulevard East and two linear 12-storey buildings fronting Queens Quay East. The amended zoning by-law, if approved, would also revise some existing zoning permissions site-wide, and allocate site-wide density, institutional uses, amenity space requirements, and bike parking requirements, on a block-by-block basis.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The amended zoning by-law would permit a total of 202,878 square metres of mixed-use development with up to 197,396 square metres of residential floor area, including 45,645 square metres of affordable rental housing (approximately 2,850 total residential units, including 553 affordable rental units, or 23% of the overall residential GFA), and 5,482 square metres of non-residential floor area. The application also includes revisions to the layout of Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space and a relocation of the planned community space to a different building. The in-force holding provisions and the Section 37 provisions will remain.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A key driver for Quayside is the provision of affordable rental housing units by the City in partnership with Waterfront Toronto and the applicant, Quayside Impact Limited Partnership (QILP), a consortium consisting of Dream and Great Gulf. The City, QILP, and Waterfront Toronto have worked on an accelerated plan to maximize the number of affordable rental housing units that can be delivered in the first phase in addition to providing additional new market purpose-built rental homes. Approximately 553 affordable rental housing units, including 56% as two, three, and four bedroom units, and approximately 1,229 purpose-built rental homes will be delivered by 2030-31. This will assist in the achievement of the HousingTO 2020-2034 Action Plan target to approve 65,000 rent-controlled homes (comprised of 6,500 rent-geared-to-income (RGI), 41,000 affordable rental and 17,500 rent-controlled market homes) by 2030.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application also requests exemption from the Part Lot Control provisions of the Planning Act, to facilitate financing, fee simple transfers, and creation of easement interests.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Zoning By-law and the Part Lot Control Exemption application. The proposed zoning by-law amendment is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan, including the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan. The proposed development will contribute to the ongoing revitalization of the Central Waterfront as a complete, mixed-use community with significant affordable housing, a generous public realm, and high standards of sustainability and design.</p> |
| 143774 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 149 College Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.6 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 60-storey mixed-use building with institutional and residential uses at 149 College Street. The application to amend the Official Plan is required to allow the proposed residential use within the Institutional Area designation. Residences associated with institutional uses, like student residences, are permitted in Institutional Areas.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposal integrates a new tower with the existing 6-storey heritage building and includes 620 privately-owned student residence units, 225 dwelling units, and 4,817 square metres of institutional space. A 235 square metre Privately Owned Publicly-accessible Space (POPS) is proposed at the north-east corner of the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 149 College Street is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act and will be retained and integrated within the new development. A separate report from Heritage Planning, regarding the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 27 | 6 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … |
| 143807 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | N | 149 College Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.7 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve alterations under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Part IV designated heritage property at 149 College Street. This is in connection with an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 60-storey mixed-use building that integrates the existing 6-storey heritage property known as the Stewart Building. The report also seeks approval to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term conservation of this significant heritage resource.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The site was designated in 1978 under the Ontario Heritage Act, on architectural and historic grounds, by City of Toronto By-law 508-1978. The designation identifies the building, which was designed by E.J. Lennox, as "a significant work in the Romanesque Revival style, by [an] important Toronto architect." The designation identifies "large arched windows, prominent wall dormers, a fine arched entrance portico and a distinctive use of stone and brick" as noteworthy features.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A heritage permit application was submitted that integrates the retained building, including the College Street north façade, the east façade and a partial east and south façade into a base building with a 60-storey building component above. The new construction incorporates stepbacks above the retained heritage building. The transition in height between the heritage building and the tower will be moderated by a glazed reveal. A new landscape open area will be included at the northeast corner of the site. Staff are of the opinion that the proposal conserves the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of the heritage property.</p> |
| 143808 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | 54000000 | N | 149 College Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.7a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on June 30, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB33.5">PB33.5</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (June 13, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> <br />This report recommends that City Council approve alterations under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act for the Part IV designated heritage property at 149 College Street. This is in connection with an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 60-storey mixed-use building that integrates the existing 6-storey heritage property known as the Stewart Building. The report also seeks approval to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement to ensure the long-term conservation of this significant heritage resource. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The site was designated in 1978 under the Ontario Heritage Act, on architectural and historic grounds, by City of Toronto By-law 508-1978. The designation identifies the building, which was designed by E.J. Lennox, as "a significant work in the Romanesque Revival style, by [an] important Toronto architect." The designation identifies "large arched windows, prominent wall dormers, a fine arched entrance portico and a distinctive use of stone and brick" as noteworthy features.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A heritage permit application was submitted that integrates the retained building, including the College Street north façade, the east façade and a partial east and south façade into a base building with a 60-storey building component above. The new construction incorporates stepbacks above the retained heritage building. The transition in height between the heritage building and the tower will be moderated by a glazed reveal. A new landscape open area will be included at the northeast corner of the site. Staff are of the opinion that the proposal conserves the cultural heritage values, attributes and character of the heritage property.</p> |
| 143812 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 333 College Street and 303 Augusta Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.8 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law, to permit a 62.3-metre (20 storeys), excluding mechanical penthouse, mixed-use building containing 638 privately-owned student residence units, and a minimum of 60 square metres of non-residential gross floor area, at 333 College Street and the rear part of 303 Augusta Avenue. The development site does not include the front part of 303 Augusta Avenue, fronting onto Augusta Avenue. This lot will be subject to a future Consent to Sever Application, not currently under consideration.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed privately-owned student residence does not meet the by-law 569-2013 definition of a student residence, which requires that a student residence is owned and operated by an educational facility or institution. The proposed development will, however, be designed and operated as a student residence. As such, staff have reviewed the proposed development against the performance standards applied to student residences within the Official Plan and Zoning By-law.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application to amend Site and Area Specific Policy 533 of the Official Plan is required to allow a building taller than 30 metres, to vary setbacks from the side property lines, to permit a retail frontage less than 60 percent and to allow for a reduction in three-bedroom units.</p> | 27 | 8 | CCOUNCIL | TE |
| 143782 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 630-646 Spadina Avenue and 67 Harbord Street - Official Plan Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.9 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan to re-designate a portion of the subject site at 630-646 Spadina Avenue and 67 Harbord Street from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas, and to designate the lands Mixed Use Areas 3 – Main Street in the Downtown Secondary Plan. Through the application process, the extent of the Official Plan Amendment has been refined to only cover the portion of the site at 630 Spadina Avenue. The application does not propose any new buildings or building additions at this time, and it is intended that the existing buildings will remain.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Minister of Municipal Affairs and Housing is the approval authority for amendments to authorized uses of land within Protected Major Transit Station Areas. If adopted by Council, the Official Plan Amendment would be forwarded to the Minister for approval under sections 17(22) and 17(34) of the Planning Act.</p> | 27 | 9 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted |
| 143766 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 1673-1675 Bathurst Street - Rental Housing Conversion Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.10 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Conversion application which proposes to convert the existing apartment building containing 8 rental dwelling units with rents that all exceed Official Plan mid-range rents at 1673-1675 Bathurst Street to condominium.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Plan of Condominium application (25 189666 STE 12 CD ) allowing the conversion of the existing 8-unit apartment building to condominium has been submitted and a Plan of Condominium approval report has been advanced concurrently with this report. The applications do not propose any alterations to the existing apartment building to accommodate the conversion. The proposal would not change existing tenants security of tenure rights.</p> | 27 | 10 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given |
| 143809 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 1673 and 1675 Bathurst Street - Plan of Condominium Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.11 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the Plan of Condominium application to allow the conversion of the existing apartment building containing 8 rental dwelling units with rents that all exceed Official Plan mid-range rents to a Standard Condominium at 1673 and 1675 Bathurst Street. No alterations are proposed to the existing apartment building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Rental Housing Conversion application (25 187566 STE 12 RH) has been reviewed concurrently with this application and has been reported on separately. The proposal would not change existing tenants security of tenure rights.</p> | 27 | 11 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council |
| 143786 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | 170 and 180 Merton Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.12 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan to secure non-residential uses in lieu of office replacement. This report also recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 141.3-metre (45-storey), excluding mechanical penthouse, mixed-use building with 531 dwelling units and 198.3 square metres of ground floor retail space at 170 and 180 Merton Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A separate report from Heritage Planning on the proposed alterations to of the existing heritage-designated building at 170 Merton Street will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 27 | 12 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | — | Public Notice Given |
| 143719 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 170 Merton Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.13 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve alterations to the property at 170 Merton Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site and grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 170 Merton Street contains the former Visiting Homemakers Association (VHA) building, constructed in 1969. It is a representative example of a distinctive Late Modern style office building designed as the headquarters for the VHA featuring octagonal towers and bays, ribbon windows, concrete brick with distinctive interlocking corners and an integrated exterior space with landscaping. The property is the first purpose-built headquarters for the VHA, an important social-welfare agency founded in Toronto in 1925.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application (25 129087 STE 12 OZ), the redevelopment proposes a 45-storey mixed-use residential building, which includes the retention of a portion of the VHA Building. The terrace of the heritage building is proposed to be used for outdoor amenity space. A full conservation scope is proposed for the retained portion of the heritage building. The new construction has been designed to be compatible with and subordinate to the heritage building. The proposal conserves the heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> | 27 |
| 143941 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 170 Merton Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.13a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.5">PB37.5</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (November 3, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> <br />This report recommends that City Council approve alterations to the property at 170 Merton Street under Part IV, Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with the proposed redevelopment of the site and grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property at 170 Merton Street contains the former Visiting Homemakers Association (VHA) building, constructed in 1969. It is a representative example of a distinctive Late Modern style office building designed as the headquarters for the VHA featuring octagonal towers and bays, ribbon windows, concrete brick with distinctive interlocking corners and an integrated exterior space with landscaping. The property is the first purpose-built headquarters for the VHA, an important social-welfare agency founded in Toronto in 1925.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In conjunction with an Official Plan and Zoning Amendment application (25 129087 STE 12 OZ), the redevelopment proposes a 45-storey mixed-use residential building, which includes the retention of a portion of the VHA Building. The terrace of the heritage building is proposed to be used for outdoor amenity space. A full conservation scope is proposed for the retained portion of the heritage building. The new construction has been designed to be compatible with and subordinate to the heritage building. The proposal conserves the heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 143797 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 530-550 Yonge Street, 145 St. Luke Lane and 6-8 Breadalbane Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.14 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the development of a 67-storey (213.5-metre, excluding mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 822 residential units and 1,012 square metres of non-residential space along the Yonge Street frontage. A 168 square metre Privately Owned Publicly Accessible Space (POPS) is proposed facing Dr. Lillian McGregor Park. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application proposes the demolition of one rental dwelling unit. The applicant has agreed to provide a Tenant Assistance Plan that is consistent with the City's current practices.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A separate report from Heritage Planning, on the proposed conservation of the designated heritage properties at 530-550 Yonge Street, 145 St. Luke Lane and 6-8 Breadalbane Street will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 27 | 14 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted |
| 143710 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 530-550 Yonge Street, 6-8 Breadalbane Street and 145 St. Luke Lane - Alterations, Demolition and New Construction of Buildings on a Designated Heritage Property under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.15 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter a designated heritage property at 530-550 Yonge Street, 6-8 Breadalbane Street and 145 St. Luke Lane, in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development includes minor alterations of the principal east facade of 538 Yonge Street and in-situ retention of 544 Yonge Street and 546-550 Yonge Street, to be incorporated into the two-storey podium of a 67-storey mixed-use building. The south façade of the existing two-storey commercial building at 530-536 Yonge Street and 6-8 Breadalbane Street will be partially retained and incorporated into a new corner building with retail storefronts on the ground floor. The remainder of the existing building will be demolished. 145 St. Luke Lane is also proposed to be demolished as part of this proposal. A Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space (POPS) fronting on St. Luke Lane will replace the western portion of the existing building. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated January 2, 2025, was submitted to support the development application and revised July 17, 2025, and October 21, 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy of the retained buildings and design of the replacement buildings.</p> |
| 143943 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 530-550 Yonge Street, 6-8 Breadalbane Street and 145 St. Luke Lane - Alterations, Demolition and New Construction of Buildings on a Designated Heritage Property under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.15a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.7">PB37.7</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter a designated heritage property at 530-550 Yonge Street, 6-8 Breadalbane Street and 145 St. Luke Lane, in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development includes minor alterations of the principal east facade of 538 Yonge Street and in-situ retention of 544 Yonge Street and 546-550 Yonge Street, to be incorporated into the two-storey podium of a 67-storey mixed-use building. The south façade of the existing two-storey commercial building at 530-536 Yonge Street and 6-8 Breadalbane Street will be partially retained and incorporated into a new corner building with retail storefronts on the ground floor. The remainder of the existing building will be demolished. 145 St. Luke Lane is also proposed to be demolished as part of this proposal. A</p>
<p>Privately-Owned Publicly Accessible Space (POPS) fronting on St. Luke Lane will replace the western portion of the existing building. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated January 2, 2025, was submitted to support the development application and revised July 17, 2025, and October 21, 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy of the retained buildings and design of the replacement buildings.</p> |
| 143791 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 543-555 Yonge Street -Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.16 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 222-metre (68-storey), excluding mechanical penthouse, mixed-use building at 543-555 Yonge Street. The proposed building cantilevers above the existing building at 555 Yonge Street, which will be maintained, and includes 679 residential units and 402 square metres of non-residential gross floor area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A separate report from Heritage Planning, on the proposed conservation of the designated heritage properties at 543-555 Yonge Street will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 27 | 16 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council |
| 143706 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 543 Yonge Street - Demolition of a Building within the Historic Yonge Street Heritage Conservation District and Approval of a Replacement Building | 2025.TE27.17 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed demolition of the 4-storey commercial building on the site at 543 Yonge Street (543, 545 and 549 Yonge Street) and approve its replacement with a 68-storey mixed-use building with a 2-storey podium, including retail at grade and residential above, in accordance with Section 42(1) 2 and 42(1) 4 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with conditions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Historic Yonge Street Heritage Conservation District ("HYSCD"). The subject property is identified as 'non-contributing' in the District Plan. The District Plan allows for the demolition of buildings or structures on non-contributing properties. The proposed new 68-storey mixed-use building complies with the intent of objectives contained within the HYSCD Plan. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development application also requires approval under the Planning Act, which is the subject of a separate report from the Director, Community Planning. Recommendations contained within this report relate solely to approvals required under the Ontario Heritage Act.</p> | 27 | 17 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … |
| 143944 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 543 Yonge Street - Demolition of a Building within the Historic Yonge Street Heritage Conservation District and Approval of a Replacement Building | 2025.TE27.17a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.8">PB37.8</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (November 4, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed demolition of the 4-storey commercial building on the site at 543 Yonge Street (543, 545 and 549 Yonge Street) and approve its replacement with a 68-storey mixed-use building with a 2-storey podium, including retail at grade and residential above, in accordance with Section 42(1) 2 and 42(1) 4 of the Ontario Heritage Act, with conditions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act as part of the Historic Yonge Street Heritage Conservation District ("HYSCD"). The subject property is identified as 'non-contributing' in the District Plan. The District Plan allows for the demolition of buildings or structures on non-contributing properties. The proposed new 68-storey mixed-use building complies with the intent of objectives contained within the HYSCD Plan.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development application also requires approval under the Planning Act, which is the subject of a separate report from the Director, Community Planning. Recommendations contained within this report relate solely to approvals required under the Ontario Heritage Act.</p> | 27 | 17 |
| 143505 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 1099 Broadview Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.18 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a mixed use building. The building would have two taller elements of 14 and 16 storeys, sharing a five storey shared podium, with an approximately 800 square metres courtyard space provided at the rear. The building would provide 313 dwelling units, with a total gross floor area of 30,480.5 square metres, including 633 square metres of non-residential space on the ground floor. A total of 207 vehicle parking spaces and 363 bicycle parking spaces are proposed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with Provincial Planning Statement (2024), conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents an appropriate use, form and scale of development that is compatible with the context.</p> | 27 | 18 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main |
| 143506 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | Y | Zoning By-law Amendment for Garden Suites on Parkmount Road Facing Craven Road - Final Report | 2025.TE27.19 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On October 9 and 10, 2024, City Council directed City Planning staff through Item “TE16.75 - Council Direction on PH14.13 - Allowing Time for a Thorough Review”, to review garden suite zoning permissions for homes on Parkmount Road that back onto Craven Road between Danforth Avenue and Hanson Street, and to allow more time for the review that Council had previously requested. The Council decision directed staff to consider matters such as provincial planning changes, previous consultation, and modifications to the zoning by-law for better integration of garden suites in the area including appropriate setbacks from Craven Road for garden suites.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Garden suites have been permitted in Toronto’s Neighbourhoods since early 2022, when City Council adopted city-wide permissions. As a priority project of the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) initiative, garden suites contribute to Toronto’s housing goals and targets, including the 2023 Housing Action Plan, and the Province’s housing target of 285,000 new homes in Toronto by 2031. The garden suite permissions provide opportunities through gentle intensification for a variety of living arrangements, providing flexibility for existing homeowners looking to rent a unit to tenants, creating additional units for multigenerational living, or those looking to downsize and age in place. To date, the City has received over 900 building permit applications for garden suites. In July 2025, Council adopted additional amendments to further support the effective implementation of garden suites in Toronto based on the findings from the Garden Suites Monitoring Program and to align Zoning By-law 569-2013 with recent provincial regulatory changes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report presents the findings from the review, feedback from public consultation, and staff’s recommended approach to reflect the distinct context of Craven Road, including recommended amendments to the zoning by-law. The recommended zoning by-law amendment would continue to permit garden suites on Parkmount Road while providing minor modifications to performance standards that reflect and address several unique characteristics on Craven Road, notably the narrowness of the street, and the through-lot character of Parkmount Road versus the facing condition of the homes fronting onto Craven Road. Staff are aware of only one other street in the City that exhibits the same characteristics.</p> |
| 143802 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 1012, 1014, 1016 and 1018 Gerrard Street East - Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.20 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 14-storey mixed-use building at 1012, 1014, 1016 and 1018 Gerrard Street East. The proposed development has 112 residential dwelling units, 7,905 square metres of residential gross floor area, 291 square metres of commercial gross floor area and one level of underground vehicular parking.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, conforms to the City's Official Plan and represents appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context. The proposed development will also provide a diversity of unit types in proximity to a future transit station, additional retail space and an improved public realm.</p> | 27 | 20 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — |
| 143801 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 1291-1311 Gerrard Street East and 243-247 Greenwood Avenue - Zoning By-law Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.21 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 12-storey mixed-use building made up of one level of underground parking, retail on the ground floor, and 278 residential units at 1291-1311 Gerrard Street East and 243-247 Greenwood Avenue. There are 29 rental replacement units, and 6 net new affordable rental units being secured.</p> | 27 | 21 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … |
| 143722 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 1291-1311 Gerrard Street East and 243-247 Greenwood Avenue - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.22 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 29 rental dwelling units located at 1291-1311 Gerrard Street East and 243-247 Greenwood Avenue. The 29 rental units are proposed to be replaced as part of the new development on the site. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development on the site at 1291-1311 Gerrard Street East and 243-247 Greenwood Avenue is the subject of a related Zoning By-law Amendment application (23 140447 STE 14 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 12-storey residential building with 282 dwelling units, including 29 replacement rental units. An approval report for the Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 27 | 22 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … |
| 143789 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 354-358 Pape Avenue - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.23 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building with one level of underground parking, retail use on the ground floor, office space on the second floor, and 41 residential units located on the upper floors at 354-358 Pape Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with Provincial Planning Statement (2024), conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents an appropriate use, form and scale of development that is compatible with the context.</p> | 27 | 23 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main | — | Public Notice Given | Community Council |
| 143810 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 6 Dawes Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.24 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit the addition of 22 storeys to the previously approved 17 storey building on the east block of the 6 Dawes Road development. The current application seeks permission for a 39 storey residential building inclusive of a four storey podium. The building would include 452 rental dwelling units, including three net new affordable rental units, with a total gross floor area of 32,343 square metres, including 50 square metres of retail space on the ground floor. There are 69 vehicle parking spaces provided in three levels above grade, and 508 bicycle parking spaces proposed in an underground level.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024), conforms to the City's Official Plan and represents an appropriate use, form and scale of development.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The report reviews and recommends the Zoning By-law Amendment with a Holding provision (H) in the Zoning By-law to address the acceptance of the Rail Safety Report by Metrolinx.</p> | 27 | 24 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report |
| 144019 | REPORT | N | N | SUPPL | INFORM | NO_ACTN | — | N | 6 Dawes Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval - Supplementary Report | 2025.TE27.24a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Supplementary Report provides an update to the report titled 6 Dawes Road - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval, dated November 19, 2025 from the Director, Community Planning, Toronto and East York (Item TE27.24). The update is to provide further information regarding the completion of Metrolinx's review of submitted Rail Safety information.</p>
<p> </p> | 27 | 24 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | Information | No Action | Supplementary | — | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143813 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 2451-2495 Danforth Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2025.TE27.25 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 13 and 29 storey mixed-use building containing 620 dwelling units at 2451-2495 Danforth Avenue. The proposal includes a 2,277 square metre grocery store, 943 square metres of retail, and 354 square metres of publicly accessible open space at-grade. A total of 254 vehicular parking spaces and 714 bicycle parking spaces are proposed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conforms to the City's Official Plan. It represents an appropriate use, form and scale of development that is compatible with the context.</p> | 27 | 25 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | Public Notice Given |
| 143780 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 38-50 Park Road - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Refusal | 2025.TE27.26 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends refusal of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 31-storey (107.9 metres, mechanical penthouse not included) mixed-use building containing 289 units (including 40 replacement rental dwelling units) and 700 square metres of non-residential gross floor area at 38-50 Park Road. The existing buildings at 38 and 40 Park road, will be demolished, and a corresponding Rental Housing Demolition application has been submitted. The application includes the retention of the designated building at 50 Park Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development does not fit the existing or planned context of the site and surrounding low-rise area. The proposed building massing, including setback to Neighbourhoods designated properties and parkland, lack of a base building, and height of 31-storeys, are not acceptable, and does not provide appropriate transition to the surrounding low-rise areas in the Rosedale Valley.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>An Official Plan Amendment is required to allow for the proposed height, to redesignate the lands from Neighbourhoods to Mixed Use Areas, to designate the lands as Mixed Use Area 2 - Intermediate in the Downtown Secondary Plan, and to reduce the right of way widening along Park Road.</p> | 27 | 26 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N |
| 143799 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 1-13 St. Clair Avenue West - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Refusal | 2025.TE27.27 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends refusal of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 160.6-metre (49-storey), excluding mechanical penthouse, mixed-use building with 340 dwelling units. The proposal integrates the existing 12-storey office building designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. There is no Heritage application to alter the designated heritage building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposal has not demonstrated how a tall building can be accommodated on this site. The proposal has not adequately addressed issues including wind conditions, servicing capacity, vehicle access and loading, or an acceptable relationship with the designated heritage building. Staff are of the opinion that the proposal does not conform with the Official Plan.</p> | 27 | 27 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — |
| 143781 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 59-81 Lawton Boulevard - Zoning By-law Amendment - Appeal Report | 2025.TE27.28 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On February 14, 2025, a Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted to permit a 129.8 and 142.6-metre (38 and 43 storeys), excluding mechanical penthouse, residential building containing 706 dwelling units. The proposed development also includes a 353 square metre on-site Parkland Dedication.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On July 14, 2025, the applicant appealed the Zoning By-law Amendment application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) due to Council not making a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and continue discussions with the applicant to resolve outstanding issues</p> | 27 | 28 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — |
| 143823 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Bloor West Village Avenue Study - Urban Design Guidelines - Final Report | 2025.TE27.29 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council adopt the Bloor West Village Avenue Study Urban Design Guidelines (the “Guidelines”), endorse the High Park Neighbourhood Area Biodiverse Landscape Manual and identify the specified properties within the Study Area as having cultural heritage value or interest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On July 8, 2014, City Council adopted a motion which requested that the Chief Planner and Executive Director undertake a review of the current built form, density, height and heritage value of properties on Bloor Street West between Keele Street and the Humber River. The Bloor West Village Avenue Study Final Consultant Report (the “Consultant Report”) was completed in 2018, which suggested a range of development policies and guidelines to allow for gentle, mid-rise intensification within the Bloor West Village Avenue Study Area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bloor West Village has a unique and active retail character that serves the local community and also as a destination. It includes existing and potential heritage properties, as well as important linkages to natural and cultural heritage resources. The Guidelines focus on the pedestrian-oriented scale of Bloor West Village as draw for residents, employees, and visitors. They support the integration of new development into Bloor West Village in a manner that builds on this attractive, livable community with a mix of uses, walkable streets, distinctive neighbourhoods, and access to a variety of open spaces, including parks and publicly accessible spaces.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The following document formalizes the previous work by providing direction and Urban Design Guidelines that have been developed to align with the current planning policy framework, which will inform new development in the Bloor West Village Urban Design Guidelines Area (the “Area”). Key objectives of the Guidelines are compatible intensification along a transit line, protection of sunlight in public spaces, celebrating natural and cultural heritage of the area, and enhancing the public realm.</p> |
| 143785 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Elm Street Streetscape Vision - Final Report | 2025.TE27.30 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council adopt the Elm Street Streetscape Vision (the Vision) for Elm Street between Yonge Street and Bay Street. The Vision aims to preserve, maintain, and enhance the existing character of Elm Street and will inform the review of development applications.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Vision illustrates pedestrian oriented design standards for the street, including improvements for pedestrians, public and café outdoor seating, planting areas, a potential mid-block crossing opportunity, and road safety enhancements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Vision was developed with community input, including three public engagement sessions and additional correspondence with the Downtown Yonge Business Improvement Area (DYBIA) and the public.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Implementation of the Vision is proposed to occur incrementally over time with each phase contributing to the completion of the overall streetscape concept.</p> | 27 | 30 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 143709 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 1266 Queen Street West - Demolition and New Construction on a Designated Heritage Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval | 2025.TE27.31 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of an existing building on a non-contributing property located at 1266 Queen Street West within the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District (PHCD) and approve the erection of a replacement building in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Zoning By-law Amendment to construct a 24-storey tower with a 5-storey podium at this property was approved in June 2024. A revision to this application to facilitate the construction of a new 27-storey tower mixed-use building with a 4-storey podium building is currently being considered by Community Planning staff. The recommendations contained within this report relate solely to approvals required under the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the Parkdale Heritage Conservation District (PHCD) Plan is in force and effect the proposed demolition and new construction requires approval under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and needs to be assessed in relation to the policies and objectives of the PHCD Plan. Heritage Planning staff have reviewed the application and consider that it complies with the PHCD Plan.</p> | 27 | 31 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N |
| 143945 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 1266 Queen Street West - Demolition and New Construction on a Designated Heritage Property under Part V, Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act - Approval | 2025.TE27.31a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.9">PB37.9</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of an existing building on a non-contributing property located at 1266 Queen Street West within the Parkdale Main Street Heritage Conservation District (PHCD) and approve the erection of a replacement building in accordance with Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p>A Zoning By-law Amendment to construct a 24-storey tower with a 5-storey podium at this property was approved in June 2024. A revision to this application to facilitate the construction of a new 27-storey tower mixed-use building with a 4-storey podium building is currently being considered by Community Planning staff. The recommendations contained within this report relate solely to approvals required under the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the Parkdale Heritage Conservation District (PHCD) Plan is in force and effect the proposed demolition and new construction requires approval under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act and needs to be assessed in relation to the policies and objectives of the PHCD Plan. Heritage Planning staff have reviewed the application and consider that it complies with the PHCD Plan.</p> | 27 |
| 143707 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.32 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 143942 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2025.TE27.32a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.6">PB37.6</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 143739 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 57600000 | N | 9 Dora Avenue - Residential Demolition Application | 2025.TE27.33 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with city wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of the existing detached house at 9 Dora Avenue (Application No. 25-239133 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or to grant the application, including any conditions, to be attached to the demolition permit application because a building permit application for a replacement building has not been applied for.</p> | 27 | 33 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — |
| 143721 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 57600000 | N | 835 Queen Street West - Residential Demolition Application | 2025.TE27.34 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Ch. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control", the application for the demolition of the existing mixed-use building, containing ground floor commercial and second floor residential, at 835 Queen Street West (Application No. 25 227295 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration because Toronto Building received a request letter from the applicant to demolish the building prior to the issuance of a replacement building permit.</p> | 27 | 34 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated | — |
| 143507 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 57600000 | N | 5 Robinson Street - Residential Demolition Application | 2025.TE27.35 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is regarding a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with city wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of the existing single detached house containing one dwelling unit at 5 Robinson Street (Application No. 24-167388 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or to grant the application, including any conditions, to be attached to the demolition permit application because the building proposed to be demolished contains one residential dwelling unit and there are no replacement building permits to be issued at this time.</p> | 27 | 35 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated |
| 143501 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 57600000 | N | 103 Hogarth Avenue - Residential Demolition Application | 2025.TE27.36 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with city-wide residential demolition control under the Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 363, under the authority of Section 33 of the Planning Act, the application for the demolition of the existing detached house located at 103 Hogarth Avenue (application number: 25-203743 DEM 00 DM) is being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration because Toronto Building has received an objection letter.</p> | 27 | 36 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 143701 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | INFORM | NO_ACTN | — | N | 103 Hogarth Avenue - Boundary Tree Review Status | 2025.TE27.36a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The City of Toronto reviewed an application for minor variances at the Committee of Adjustment associated with proposed construction at 103 Hogarth Avenue. The Committee of Adjustment provided conditional approval of the minor variances requiring the applicant to submit an application to injure or remove privately owned trees. This condition was satisfied when the applicant applied to the City and a clearance letter was issued.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The City received an application to remove a Northern catalpa tree (Catalpa speciosa) measuring 64 cm in diameter, located on the boundary between 103 Hogarth and 105 Hogarth Avenue in order to facilitate the construction of a new dwelling. Staff assessed the tree to be in poor condition and as such qualified for a permit to remove based on its condition. Following completion of the notification process for Neighbour and Boundary Trees a permit to remove the tree was issued on October 15, 2025.</p> | 27 | 36 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | Information | No Action |
| 143700 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 57600000 | N | 93 Silver Birch Avenue - Application to Remove a Private Tree | 2025.TE27.37 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one privately owned tree located on the boundary line between the properties of 93 and 95 Silver Birch Avenue. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting the removal of the tree is concern over the potential failure of the tree that is growing with a strong lean over the house.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The white oak tree (Quercus alba) measures 74 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.</p> | 27 | 37 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 143508 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WITHDRAW | 57600000 | N | 34 Tubman Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption | 2025.TE27.38 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 34 Tubman Avenue (parent address), with convenience addresses of 225, 227, and 229 Sumach Street, 36, and 38 Tubman Avenue, has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>B. Fence height.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(1) No fence described in the following Table shall, when measured at any point along its length from the average grade level measured perpendicular to and one meter away on either side of the fence, exceed the height set out in the Table for the fence.<br /> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 34 Tubman Avenue is requesting an exemption for their:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Existing fence, and gates, that encloses three ground-floor residential units of a condominium building.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Constructed with a uniformed lower masonry portion and an upper aluminum/composite horizontal board on board fencing portion.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Consistent height of 2.1 meters.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Maximum Height of Fence: 1.2 meters</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and noted the violations contrary to City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1)</p> | 27 | 38 | CCOUNCIL | TE |
| 143504 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | DEFERIND | 57600000 | N | 33 Morse Street - Application for Fence Exemption | 2025.TE27.39 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 33 Morse Street has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1):</p>
<p> </p>
<p>B. Fence height.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><br />(1) No fence described in the following Table shall, when measured at any point along its length from the average grade level measured perpendicular to and one meter away on either side of the fence, exceed the height set out in the Table for the fence.<br /> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 33 Morse Street is requesting an exemption for;</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Proposed increase to existing fence.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Increased height of existing fence from 2m to proposed height of 2.8m.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Fence constructed with pressure treated wood, identical to existing fence.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1). The property complied with the violation notice and then applied for a fence exemption.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The applicant has indicated that the proposed fence height is intended to create a visual barrier in response to a spotlight and surveillance camera installed on the neighbouring property. According to the applicant, these installations contribute to an ongoing interpersonal conflict, which they describe as “escalating” and “making life unbearable.” The applicant is seeking to construct the taller fence in order to ensure privacy and peace for themselves and their household.</p> |
| 143558 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 57600000 | N | 289 Barton Avenue - Application for Fence Exemption | 2025.TE27.40 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 289 Barton Avenue has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>B. Fence height.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><em>1. No fence described in the following Table shall, when measured at any point along its length from the average grade level measured perpendicular to and one meter away on either side of the fence, exceed the height set out in the Table for the fence.</em><br /> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 289 Barton Avenue is requesting an exemption for their;</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Existing fence constructed with pressure treated wood and mounted with an artificial boxwood privacy screen, polyethylene (or similar synthetic material) designed to mimic the appearance of boxwood foliage.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Average range of height of 2.75 to 3.0 metres.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Maximum height permitted is 2 metres.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1).</p> | 27 | 40 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N |
| 143557 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 57600000 | N | 47 Lewis Street - Application for Fence Exemption | 2025.TE27.41 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Applicant for 47 Lewis Street has requested Toronto and East York Community Council to exempt their property from the following by-law requirements:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1):</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">B. Fence height.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;"><br />1. No fence described in the following Table shall, when measured at any point along its length from the average grade level measured perpendicular to and one meter away on either side of the fence, exceed the height set out in the Table for the fence.<br /> </p>
<p>The Applicant for 47 Lewis Street is requesting an exemption for;</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Existing wooden lattice fence</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-Measured to height:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">2.48 metres surrounding the rear deck</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">2.26 metres through rear yard adjacent to the laneway suite</p>
<p style="padding-left: 60px;">2.8 metres in the side yard.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">-The maximum height permitted is 2.0 meters.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Municipal Licensing and Standards Division has inspected the subject property and issued a notice of violation of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 447-1.2B(1).</p> | 27 | 41 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N |
| 143503 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | DEFERIND | 59400000 | N | Application for a Sidewalk Cafe Permit Located at 561 Danforth Avenue, Carlaw Avenue flankage | 2025.TE27.42 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The purpose of this staff report is to address the application submitted to Municipal Licensing and Standards in the matter of an application for a Sidewalk Café permit at 561 Danforth Avenue, Carlaw Avenue flankage.</p> | 27 | 42 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred Indefinitely | Main | Delegated | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 143753 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management | 2025.TE27.43 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to appoint and remove directors from the boards of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) that fall within its geographic boundaries.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to make changes to the Bloor-Yorkville, Broadview Danforth, CityPlace and Fort York, College West, Danforth Village, Greektown on the Danforth, Oakwood Village, Rosedale Main Street, The Beach, and Toronto Financial District BIA Boards of Management, in accordance with the requirement of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas.</p> | 27 | 43 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — |
| 143815 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Team Canada FanFest - February 6-8, 2026 | 2025.TE27.44 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The City of Toronto provides opportunities to access Nathan Phillips Square for eligible events through a permitting process administered by the Economic Development and Culture Division.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to request exemptions from Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636, "Public Squares", and former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 237, “Nathan Phillips Square”, for an event that is proposed to be held on Nathan Phillips Square on February 6-8, 2026.</p> | 27 | 44 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143755 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 140 Cumberland Street - Encroachment Appeal | 2025.TE27.45 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 140 Cumberland Street regarding their encroachment application. The encroachment consists of an existing enclosed patio structure within the Cumberland Street boulevard and sidewalk, which is in contravention of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking authority from Toronto and East York Community Council to allow the ongoing maintenance of the enclosed patio structure within the public right-of-way at 140 Cumberland Street, which is in contravention of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of.</p> | 27 | 45 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 143754 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 1320 Queen Street East - Encroachment Appeal - Basement Entrance | 2025.TE27.46 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 1320 Queen Street East regarding their encroachment application. The proposed encroachment consists of a basement entrance that extends 2.27m below grade with a 0.10m setback from the sidewalk, which is in contravention of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking authority from Toronto and East York Community Council to construct and maintain a basement entrance within the public right-of-way at 1320 Queen Street East, which is in contravention of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use Of.</p> | 27 | 46 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 143751 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 316-336 Campbell Avenue - Construction Staging Area (Phase 2) | 2025.TE27.47 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Marlin Spring Developments has undertaken the construction of a 26-storey residential building at 316-336 Campbell Avenue. The site is located on the west side of Campbell Avenue, north of Dupont Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>By way of background, Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on January 14, 2025 adopted Item 2025.TE19.37 and in doing so, authorized a closure of a 1.5 metre wide portion of the north-south laneway, between a point 35 metres north of Dupont Street and a point 56 metres further north, from March 1, 2025 to September 30, 2025, in order to facilitate excavation and shoring works (Phase 1) of the project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the sidewalk on the west side of Campbell Avenue abutting the work area to facilitate Phase 2 of the development. Pedestrian movements on the west side of Campbell Avenue abutting the site will be restricted and pedestrians will be directed to the sidewalk on the east side of Campbell Avenue. In addition, authorization is being requested to extend the time duration of the 1.5 metre occupation of the of the north/south laneway; and to close a 1 metre wide portion of the east-west laneway, abutting the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The above requested closures are required for a period of 25 months, from December 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027 to facilitate construction staging operations for the development.</p> | 27 | 47 |
| 143748 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 980 Dufferin Street and 1141 Bloor Street West - TTC Tunnel Construction (Stage1) -Construction Staging Area Time Extension | 2025.TE27.48 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As Bloor Street West is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bloor Dufferin Holdings LP and Ontario Holdings Ltd is constructing an underground pedestrian tunnel connecting the existing Dufferin Street TTC station to the proposed 33-storey building. The tunnel will run north to south and will be situated on Bloor Street West, just west of the Dufferin Street and Bloor Street West intersection.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>By way of background, City Council, at its meeting on February 6, 2024, authorized a construction staging area on Bloor Street West, to facilitate construction staging operations for Stage1 of the project, from February 29, 2024 to December 31, 2024, inclusive. The developer has requested an extension of the duration of the construction staging area on Bloor Street West, as the site has encountered unforeseen delays obtaining approvals, coordinating final permits, legal agreements, and stakeholder signoffs required to begin the work. Consequently, the delays impacted the original construction schedule and start of the work has been deferred to February 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At its meeting on February 5, 2025, City Council approved a time extension of the construction staging area on 980 Dufferin Street and 1141 Bloor Street West, from February 28, 2025, to January 31, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Presently, the developer is seeking an additional extension for the duration of the construction staging on 980 Dufferin Street and 1141 Bloor Street West as the project continues to experience delays. While the list of delays has been significantly reduced since the previous extension, the final legal agreements remain outstanding. Resolution of the final legal agreements are anticipated shortly, and the developer expects to commence early tunnel construction activities in December 2025 with major construction beginning in early 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Furthermore, since the time of the original approval, the developer has modified the traffic management plan by reducing the width of the construction staging area, in order to maintain a 1.2 metre wide bicycle lane on the north side of the roadway. In addition, closure of the southbound right-tun lane will be required to support the enforcement of the right-turn prohibition at the intersection.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>It should be noted that this report is for Stage 1 of the TTC tunnel construction project only. The remaining construction stages will be discussed in future staff reports.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In view of the above, Transportations Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area, with minor revisions to the traffic management plan on Dufferin Street and on Bloor Street West, for an additional 12 months, from February 1, 2026, to February 1, 2027, in order to accommodate construction operations in Stage 1 of the project.</p> |
| 143747 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Harbour Street (200 Queens Quay West) - Construction Staging Area | 2025.TE27.49 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As Harbour Street is classified as a major arterial street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Rockwell Toronto Construction Inc is constructing a 59-storey condominium building at 200 Queens Quay West. The site is located on the southeast corner of Harbour Street and Lower Simcoe Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the Waterfront Trail and the eastbound curb lane on the south side of Harbour Street, for a period of 55 months, from December 31, 2025 to July 30, 2030, in order to facilitate construction staging operations. Trail users on the south side of Harbour Street will be restricted. Pedestrians will be directed to the north sidewalk and people cycling will be detoured onto the existing (and continuous) cycle tracks/bike lanes around the closure.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed construction staging area will be in place during the FIFA World Cup 2026 tournament. The operations at this site will be affected during the tournament especially on match days and will include a restriction on deliveries to the site and the staging of construction vehicles. The applicant will be expected to modify their operations in accordance with conditions established with the work zone coordinator in advance of the tournament.</p> | 27 | 49 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N |
| 143702 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 1 Roxborough Street West (Phase 2) - Construction Staging Area | 2025.TE27.50 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>North Drive has undertaken construction of a 12-storey residential condominium building at 1 Roxborough Street West. The site is located on the southwest corner of Yonge Street and Roxborough Street West.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on April 3, 2025 adopted Item - 2025.TE21.26, and in doing so, authorized the full closure of Paul Hahn Lane, between Roxborough Street West and a point 49 metres south, from April 30, 2025 to November 30, 2025, in order to facilitate excavation and shoring works (Phase 1). Occupation of the public right-of-way on Roxborough Street West was not required during this phase.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the time duration of the full closure of Paul Hahn Lane, between Roxborough Street West and a point 49 metres south. In addition, authorization is a being requested to temporarily close the south sidewalk and a 3.6 metre wide portion of the eastbound curb lane on Roxborough Street West, between Yonge Street and a point 35 metres west, in order to facilitate construction activities in Phase 2 (below and above grade formwork). Pedestrian movements on the south side of Roxborough Street West abutting the site will be restricted. Pedestrians will be redirected to the north sidewalk. The requested closures are required for a period of 25 months, from December 1, 2025 to December 31, 2027, to facilitate construction staging operations for the development.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed construction staging area will require a temporary removal of total six parking machine spaces on the north and south side of Roxborough Street West. The applicant will be responsible for paying the lost revenue for the six parking spaces.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To minimize construction vehicles infiltration on local roads the approval of the construction staging permit is conditional that all construction vehicles must enter and exit the construction gates on Roxborough Street West using the shortest path from Yonge Street. Construction vehicles are prohibited from travelling westbound on Roxborough Street West to Avenue Road. Furthermore, it is the obligation of the developer to ensure that access into the site or egress movements are conducted in a manner that upholds public safety.</p> |
| 143836 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Transit Priority Measures to Support the 505 Dundas 6-Minute Network | 2025.TE27.51 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Transportation Services is requesting approval, on behalf of the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC), to install transit priority measures (TPMs) to support 6-minute headways on the 505 Dundas streetcar route from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m. daily, with these service improvements to 6-minute headways beginning in November 2025. If approved, the TPMs to support the 6-minute headways would be implemented January 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed changes aim to benefit the passengers using the 505 Dundas route, who currently total over 205,000 per week.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to recommend a suite of TPMs to help improve the speed and reliability of the 505 Dundas route and alleviate the risk of increased bunching and gapping associated with moving to a more frequent headway. The proposed changes span Dundas Street West between Bloor Street West (near Dundas West Station) and Dovercourt Road; and Dundas Street East between Yonge Street and Parliament Street. The changes include expanding ‘No Stopping’ coverage of the AM and PM peak periods on weekdays, as well as new and expanded left-turn restrictions on Dundas Street and Wellesley Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The change to curbside regulations proposed in this report is to have ‘No Stopping’ coverage in both the AM and PM peak periods on both sides of the street, where it is currently only AM or PM. The hours for the new ‘No Stopping’ period reflect the hours used on the opposite side of the street. This would make the ‘No Stopping’ match for both sides of the road for both the AM and PM peak periods, improving consistency for the restrictions along the corridor while improving traffic flow for the added periods. For example, if the north side of Dundas Street West has ‘No Stopping’ from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m., Mon. to Fri., and the south side has ‘No Stopping’ from 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., Mon. to Fri., both sides of Dundas Street West are proposed to have ‘No Stopping’ from 7 a.m. to 9 a.m. and 4 p.m. to 6 p.m., Mon. to Fri.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The changes proposed in this report only span a portion of the 505 Dundas route - broader changes for the entire corridor are still being investigated and will be the subject of a future report. The TTC will also work with the City to monitor the impacts of the proposed changes to determine if the extents and the periods need to be changed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The changes proposed in this report impact the AM and PM peak periods for ‘No Stopping’ restrictions on weekdays while the left-turn restrictions impact different periods depending on the location. Based on 2025 travel time data, there are additional time periods during the week that have slow speeds on the 505 Dundas route, such as Saturday and Sunday afternoons. The TTC, in partnership with Transportation Services, will continue to engage with customers, local Councillors, residents, and BIAs along the 505 Dundas route on more comprehensive TPMs that will aim to improve the speed and reliability of transit.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The recommendations in this report support the initiative to improve transit speed and reliability, as outlined in the Congestion Management Plan. The proposed TPMs support the designation of Dundas Street East and West in the area covered by this report as a Priority Roadway for transit improvement, as identified in the RapidTO: Surface Transit Network Plan approved by City Council in February 2024.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As TTC operates transit service on Dundas Street East and Dundas Street West, City Council approval of this report is required.</p> |
| 143822 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Pedestrian and Cycling Safety, Congestion Management, and Traffic Safety Improvements related to the proposed Ontario Place (955 Lakeshore Boulevard West) Redevelopment | 2025.TE27.52 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting of January 14, 2025, Toronto and East York Community Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services and the Director, Waterfront Secretariat to report back in the fourth quarter of 2025 on:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- opportunities to make pedestrian and cycling safety improvements in the vicinity of Ontario Place, aligned and coordinated with works that are to be undertaken by the Province and its Ontario Place redevelopment partners; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- opportunities to address congestion management and traffic safety on Lake Shore Boulevard near Ontario Place, aligned and coordinated with works that are to be undertaken by the Province and its Ontario Place redevelopment partners.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p>This report provides an update on the proposed safety and congestion management improvements in the Ontario Place area, including:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- proposed safety improvements for pedestrians, people cycling, and people driving at three (3) key intersections on Lake Shore Boulevard West, fronting the Ontario Place redevelopment;</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- a description of the ongoing work to address congestion management and improve traffic safety on Lakeshore Boulevard West, in the vicinity of the Ontario Place redevelopment; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- potential options to improve north/south pedestrian access between the Ontario Place redevelopment and Exhibition Place, nearby transit stops, and other off-site improvements to be considered in coordination with further design and implementation work.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p>Designs related to the Ontario Place redevelopment are in progress, including designs for work that will be undertaken by Infrastructure Ontario (IO) on behalf of the Ontario Ministry of Tourism, Culture and Sports, and work that will be undertaken by the site's tenants. Given that this design work is ongoing and given the need for coordination of designs for the development site and the public right-of-way, it is proposed that staff report back with an update in Q1 of 2027.</p> |
| 143763 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Sidewalk Network in Liberty Village - Missing Links | 2025.TE27.53 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report responds to a request from Toronto and East York Community Council to report back on delivery opportunities for missing links in the Liberty Village sidewalk network, specifically in advance of FIFA 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services staff conducted a review of streets in Liberty Village that currently have missing sidewalks. This report provides details on how and when these sidewalks can be constructed through upcoming developments with active site plan applications under review as well as the coordinated state-of-good-repair program including locations programmed within the next five years. Due to the complexities of sidewalk construction outlined in this report, it is not feasible to complete design and construction of permanent sidewalks in this area before FIFA 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services will continue discussions with the local Councillor and adjacent properties regarding a proposed quick-build sidewalk installation on the west side of Mowat Avenue between King Street West and Liberty Street in advance of FIFA 2026.</p> | 27 | 53 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 143509 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Traffic Management in Ward 14 related to the King Street East and Church Street Intersection Project | 2025.TE27.54 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On April 23 and 24, 2025, City Council directed Transportation Services in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council with information on how the TTC tracks and watermain at King Street East and Church Street degraded to the point of requiring repair and associated diversion, and the ongoing active traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue, and Gerrard Street East, including a specific update on actions taken, and additional recommendations at Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to provide an explanation as to why the work at King Street East and Church Street was scheduled for 2025, and to provide a summary of the ongoing and planned traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue and Gerrard Street East, including additional recommendations for the intersection of Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p> | 27 | 54 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 143838 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Vehicle Width Restriction - Public Lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and Public Lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East | 2025.TE27.55 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is seeking authority to prohibit vehicles greater than two metres in width from travelling on the lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and the lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East. Prohibiting vehicles which have a width of two metres or more from travelling in the subject lane sections would be beneficial in reducing the incidence of damage to the surrounding private properties.</p> | 27 | 55 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated | — |
| 143800 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Spaces - November 2025 (Delegated) | 2025.TE27.56 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.</p> | 27 | 56 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 143798 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Space - Davenport Road (Non-Delegated) | 2025.TE27.57 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Davenport Road, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space on the south side of Davenport Road for persons with disabilities.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the course of the investigation, it was noted that there was a discrepancy between the posted signs and the by-lawed parking regulations. Recommendation 2 will correct this inconsistency.</p> | 27 | 57 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … |
| 143725 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | On-Street Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - Parking Amendments (Delegated Locations) | 2025.TE27.58 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report outlines the parking by-law amendments required to implement three (3) Electric Vehicle (EV) charging locations on Humberside Avenue, Hallam Avenue and Browning Avenue, for the roll out of six (6) charging stations for which this Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision. These locations have been reviewed and supported by the local Councillors.</p> | 27 | 58 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143724 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | On-Street Electric Vehicle Charging Stations - Parking Amendments (Non-Delegated Locations) | 2025.TE27.59 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report outlines the parking by-law amendments required to implement two (2) Electric Vehicle (EV) charging locations on Lansdowne Avenue and Pape Avenue, for the roll out of four (4) charging stations. These locations have been reviewed and supported by the local Councillors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In addition, the report also recommends technical amendments to the parking regulations for existing EV charging station locations on Carlton Street, Dovercourt Road and Queen Street East, which were approved and implemented in 2022.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the Toronto Transit Commission operates a transit service on the highways mentioned in this report, City Council approval of this report is required.</p> | 27 | 59 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — |
| 143824 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Elm Avenue - Parking Amendments | 2025.TE27.60 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending that the existing standing prohibition, in effect from 3:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday to Friday, on the south side of Elm Avenue, between Mount Pleasant Road and Sherbourne Street North, be amended to include the 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m., Monday to Friday time period. This will deter parking during the morning peak hours to help improve unobstructed two-way traffic flow on this roadway, particularly during the drop-off times at Branksome Hall private school.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is also recommending expanding the existing parking prohibition in effect at all times on the south side of Elm Avenue, between Mount Pleasant Road and Sherbourne Street North, further east. This parking amendment will help deter parking in the vicinity of the driveway that services Clifton Manor Apartments (5 and 11 Elm Avenue) to improve sightlines and allow unobstructed access/egress for residents.</p> | 27 | 60 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 143825 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | King Street East - Passenger Loading Zone | 2025.TE27.61 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on King Street East, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending that the existing taxicab stand on the south side of King Street East, east of Ontario Street, be changed to a passenger loading zone. The proposed amendment will better suit the current needs of the street, accommodating shuttle bus pick-up/drop-off for the Globe and Mail located at 351 King Street East. This change will have minimal impacts on local traffic and parking operations.</p> | 27 | 61 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … |
| 143784 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Compulsory Stop Control - May Street and South Drive | 2025.TE27.62 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to install a compulsory southbound stop control at the uncontrolled "T" type intersection of May Street and South Drive. Based on an assessment undertaken, the installation of compulsory stop control at this intersection is recommended to clearly define the right-of-way and enhance safety for all road users.</p> | 27 | 62 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143828 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) - Various Streets in Ward 4 | 2025.TE27.63 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending the installation of speed humps on the seven streets in Ward 4 listed below. Staff's assessment indicates the criteria as set out in the updated Traffic Calming Policy has been satisfied for all streets. Therefore, speed humps should be installed on the streets recommended in this report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Alhambra Avenue, between Boustead Avenue and Bloor Street West</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Glendonwynne Road, between Bloor Street West and Glenlake Avenue (south intersection)</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Gwynne Avenue, between King Street West and Queen Street West</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Humberside Avenue, between Dundas Street West and Indian Road Crescent</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Indian Road Crescent, between Glenlake Avenue and Annette Street</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Montye Avenue, between Willard Avenue and Jane Street</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Vernon Street, between Gilmour Avenue and Runnymede Road</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the investigation, Transportation Services discovered the discrepancy between the by-lawed compulsory stop controls and the posted signage on Alhambra Avenue. Recommendations 2 and 3 will rectify these inconsistencies.</p> | 27 |
| 143826 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Billings Avenue - Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) | 2025.TE27.64 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services has reviewed the need for speed humps on Billings Avenue, between Athletic Avenue and Dundas Street East. The assessment indicates the warrant criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been satisfied. Therefore, staff do not recommend the installation of speed humps on Billings Avenue.</p> | 27 | 64 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143829 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Cadorna Avenue - Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) | 2025.TE27.65 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services has reviewed the need for speed humps on Cadorna Avenue, between Davies Crescent and O'Connor Drive. The assessment indicates the warrant criteria as set out in the Traffic Calming Policy has not been satisfied. Therefore, staff do not recommend the installation of speed humps on Cadorna Avenue.</p> | 27 | 65 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 143769 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Re-opening Item TE25.15 - 236-254 Old Weston Road - Residential Demolition Applications | 2025.TE27.66 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>City staff have requested the removal of a condition requiring sod to be laid related to the residential demolition applications at 236-254 Old Weston Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The area will soon be used as a secured construction access point for the Davenport Road Extension project, and will be enclosed with fencing and sediment control measures. The site will support major construction activities including excavation, utility installations, streetlighting, and roadworks. Additionally, utility relocations by Metrolinx and other providers are planned.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Given the imminent and intensive use of the site, installing sod would be a temporary and unnecessary expense to the public, as it would be removed shortly after.</p> | 27 | 66 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — |
| 143771 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Re-Opening and Amending Item TE24.61, Brock Avenue - Parking Amendments | 2025.TE27.67 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At our meeting on July 8, 2025, Toronto and East York Community Council adopted a motion removing switchover parking days on Brock Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting that this item be re-opened and amended as there has been a bylaw issue identified between Bloor Street West and Wallace Avenue.</p> | 27 | 67 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 143510 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Barton Avenue Traffic Calming | 2025.TE27.68 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Barton Avenue is a narrow east-west residential street in Seaton Village which used to carry primarily local traffic between Bathurst Street and Christie Street. A previous Councillor created a maze on other east-west streets in Seaton Village. This, together with navigation apps such as Waze, has funnelled cut-through traffic onto Barton Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Since 2018, Barton Avenue residents and the Seaton Village Residents Association have debated options for discouraging cut through traffic. The time for action has now come, due to population and traffic increases, and the forthcoming RapidTO Bathurst streetcar lane.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Extensive local consultation by the SVRA, and by the local councillor, has revealed a local preference for discouraging eastbound cut through traffic by making Barton Avenue one way westbound between Clinton Street and Christie Street.</p> | 27 | 68 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Deferred | Main |
| 143746 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 80 Mill Street - Installation of an Accessible Loading Zone | 2025.TE27.69 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am writing to request parking amendments to Mill Street to allow for safe pick up and drop off at 80 Mill Street. In consultation with local residents and the Gooderham and Worts Neighbourhood Association, turning the existing “15-minute parking” zone outside the entrance to 80 Mill Street to an Accessible Loading Zone will ensure that people using Wheel-Trans services or accessibility permits can be picked up and dropped off safely outside 80 Mill Street.</p> | 27 | 69 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 144010 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Dupont Street - Parking Amendments | 2025.TE27.70 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Small business owners on Dupont Street near Campbell Avenue have expressed concerns regarding the lack of available parking spaces for customers visiting their locations. The current parking regulations, which include an unsigned parking limit, fronting these businesses create conflicts for visitors and customers in the neighbourhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed recommendations from Transportation Services will implement a one-hour signed maximum on the section of Dupont Street where the impacted businesses are located. These changes will help to discourage long-term parking, protect spaces for permit parking holders, and support local businesses by increasing parking turnover for visitors and shoppers</p> | 27 | 70 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | — | — | Community Council |
| 144105 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures and Parking Amendments on Boon Avenue, between Morrison Avenue and Eversfield Road | 2025.TE27.71 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents on Boon Avenue have shared their concerns regarding speeding vehicles causing accidents and near misses involving residents living in the area. This section of Boon Avenue, located north of Rogers Road, was not considered for traffic calming measures when they were approved for the section south down to St. Clair Avenue West. This oversight creates a significant gap, resulting in drivers speeding up as they exit the traffic calming zone.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey hand-delivered to homes by my office, residents further shared their experiences and voted in strong support for the installation of speed humps. I heard similar concerns and support for speed humps at a neighbourhood meeting hosted at St. John Bosco earlier this year. The installation of these traffic calming measures will help improve safety and complete an existing network of speed humps on Boon Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>During a review by Transportation Services, City staff identified discrepancies between parking regulations listed in the bylaws and posted signage on Boon Avenue. A set of recommendations in this motion corrects this issue.</p> | 27 | 71 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … |
| 144102 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Bloem Avenue | 2025.TE27.72 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents on Bloem Avenue have contacted my office to share concerns regarding speeding vehicles and dangerous drivers impacting the safety of this community. Bloem Avenue extends from Dufferin Street and is home to the New Hope Community Church that welcomes hundreds of people every week. I have heard from several residents that drivers on Dufferin Street often use Bloem Avenue as a cut-through to avoid traffic, which adds to these traffic safety issues.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A survey hand-delivered to homes by my office confirmed strong support for the installation of speed humps on Bloem Avenue. This traffic calming measure will help improve traffic safety and work alongside a recently approved turn-prohibition on Dufferin Street to reduce cut-through traffic.</p> | 27 | 72 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — |
| 144107 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Morrison Avenue | 2025.TE27.73 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Morrison Avenue, located between St. Clair Avenue West and Rogers Road, is located in the heart of North Corso and connects hundreds of residents to local shops, schools, parks, and public transit. I have heard from many residents and the North Corso Residents’ Association that drivers too often speed excessively down Morrison Avenue, putting them and their families at risk. Residents have also shared their experiences with accidents and near misses as a result of dangerous driving. As this neighbourhood continues to grow, there is an urgent need for traffic calming measures.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey hand-delivered to homes by my office, residents along Morrison Avenue overwhelmingly supported the installation of speed humps as a proposed traffic calming measure. The addition of speed humps will help improve traffic safety for residents living in the area and support existing traffic calming measures on neighbouring streets.</p> | 27 | 73 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted |
| 144110 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Peterborough Avenue | 2025.TE27.74 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I have heard from residents on Peterborough Avenue regarding speeding vehicles impacting safety on their street. There have been many near misses involving dangerous drivers travelling off Dufferin Street aiming to avoid traffic at nearby intersections. These concerns and recent incidents highlight an urgent need for traffic calming measures on Peterborough Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey hand-delivered to Peterborough Avenue homes by my office, a strong majority of residents voted in favour of installing speed humps to reduce speeding and improve safety for all residents.</p> | 27 | 74 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 144101 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Via Italia | 2025.TE27.75 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Via Italia, located south of St. Clair Avenue West and north of Davenport Road, is in the middle of a busy neighbourhood connecting hundreds of residents to nearby schools, parks, small businesses, and transit. However, many residents have raised serious concerns about speeding vehicles that routinely ignore stop signs and endanger lives. Parents have reported numerous near misses involving their young children due to reckless driving and speeding.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey conducted by my office, residents along Via Italia overwhelmingly supported the installation of speed humps as a proposed traffic calming measure. The addition of speed humps will improve traffic safety for residents living in the area and support existing traffic calming measures in this neighbourhood.</p> | 27 | 75 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — |
| 144098 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Frederick Street Traffic Calming (Speed Humps) | 2025.TE27.76 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>My office has heard from residents on Frederick Street between The Esplanade and Henry Lane Terrace regarding the need for traffic calming on their street to address safety concerns and received a petition in support of these changes.</p> | 27 | 76 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … |
| 144089 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | John Street Project Communication, Engagement and Construction Management Update | 2025.TE27.77 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The John Street Cultural corridor, from Stephanie Street to south of Front Street West, is recognized as a route of civic and cultural importance in the City, encompassing major facilities and institutions including the Art Gallery of Ontario, the National Film Board of Ontario, the CBC Broadcast Centre, the Princess of Wales and Royal Alexandra Theatres, the TIFF Bell Lightbox, to name just a few. City Council, in considering plans and studies of this area at various times over the last few years, designated John Street as a "Cultural Corridor", an "Avenue of the Arts", and a "Pedestrian Priority Route".</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Local stakeholders, including the Toronto Downtown West BIA, have expressed the need for reliable, timely, and proactive communication regarding the progress of the John Street Corridor Improvements. Effective construction management and community engagement are essential to minimizing disruption and ensuring transparency throughout the project.</p> | 27 | 77 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted |
| 144074 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | All-way Stop Control- Soudan Avenue and Lillian Street | 2025.TE27.78 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to authorize an all-way compulsory stop control at the intersection of Soudan Avenue and Lillian Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>There is sustained concern from residents regarding excessive speeding along Soudan Avenue and lack of compliance with the existing one-way designation on Lillian St, leading to unsafe conditions at this intersection and along Lillian St. I am confident that the installation of an all-way stop at this location will improve the safety of this intersection.</p> | 27 | 78 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 144072 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Rosemary Lane Parking Amendments | 2025.TE27.79 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to rescind the existing parking prohibition on the north and east side of Rosemary Lane between Dewbourne Avenue and Bathurst Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Rosemary Lane residents have requested that this parking prohibition be rescinded, citing the difficulty of finding parking on their street. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the parking reforms they have been organizing for.</p> | 27 | 79 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 144015 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Power Street - Heavy Truck Prohibition | 2025.TE27.80 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>For many years, residents have raised safety concerns about heavy truck traffic on Power Street for all road users. Power is a small local road, home to several residential buildings and a dog off leash area. The road intersects with westbound traffic coming off the Don Valley Parkway off-ramp onto Richmond Street East as well as eastbound traffic travelling towards the Adelaide Street East Bridge.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To improve safety in the area, the City is currently in the process of installing new traffic signals at the intersections of Power Street and Richmond Street East, and Power Street and Adelaide Street East. As this work is being undertaken, I asked Transportation Services staff to review additional changes that could further bolster safety on the corridor. A heavy truck ban emerged as an initiative that was proposed by residents and supported by staff.</p> | 27 | 80 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 144071 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Queen Street East Construction - Parking Replacement near Queen Street East and Broadview Avenue | 2025.TE27.81 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the TTC and Toronto Water construction begins on Queen Street East between Broadview Avenue and Davies Avenue, we are already experiencing the traffic and parking impacts on Ward 14. Due to feedback from residents and the BIA, I have heard accessibility concerns with the 25 parking spots that have been occupied on Queen Street East for this construction work.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am disappointed that replacement parking was not proactively considered before this construction project was awarded. The project has been delayed since early November and is now rescheduled for January 2026. However, parking on Queen St. E continues to be occupied despite no active work taking place, which does not reflect the needs of the community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For the duration of this construction, I am requesting that parking regulations on Carroll Street be temporarily adjusted to allow applicable daytime parking. Additionally, I ask that Transportation Services, in collaboration with the local Councillor and the Riverside BIA, investigate options for replacement parking in the immediate area.</p> | 27 | 81 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter |
| 144085 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Speed Bumps in Public Lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and Public Lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East | 2025.TE27.82 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents near Gerrard Street East and Broadview Avenue have reached out to my office regarding speeding concerns in the public lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue. Although there are some bollards in the laneway, the traffic speeds persist, and vehicles have been repeatedly damaging the home at 244 Boulton Avenue. There is a high volume of traffic in this laneway as is the main access point for businesses on Gerrard Street East.</p> | 27 | 82 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 144092 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Eversfield Road | 2025.TE27.83 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents on Eversfield Road contacted my office to share concerns regarding traffic safety issues on their street. I have heard about their experiences with near misses involving speeding vehicles travelling off of Dufferin Street and using this local street to avoid traffic. These concerns highlight an immediate need for traffic calming measures on Eversfield Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey hand-delivered to homes by my office, a strong majority of residents voted in favour of installing speed humps to help reduce speeding and improve safety in this busy neighbourhood.</p> | 27 | 83 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 144093 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Hatherley Road | 2025.TE27.84 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Hatherley Road extends west from a very busy section of Dufferin Street and remains an important connection to numerous neighbourhoods, schools, and parks. Drivers often use Hatherley Road, designated as a local street, to avoid travelling through nearby major intersections. This increased pressure on Hatherley Road has resulted in growing traffic safety issues for residents, including speeding through stop signs and aggressive driving. As many young children live on and walk along Hatherley Road, there is an urgent need for traffic safety improvements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through a neighbourhood survey hand-delivered to homes on Hatherley Road, residents voted in strong support of installing speed humps to reduce speeding and improve traffic safety for all residents.</p> | 27 | 84 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — |
| 144113 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Installation of Traffic Calming Measures on Sellers Avenue | 2025.TE27.85 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents on Sellers Avenue have contacted my office to share concerns regarding speeding vehicles travelling through the neighbourhood. Sellers Avenue is located south of Rogers Road and near Dufferin Street and often attracts drivers seeking to bypass traffic on arterial roads. The community has reported serious incidents, including accidents that injured pets, persistent speeding at all hours, and near misses involving children playing outside. Many fear that without action, a serious accident is inevitable.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In a survey hand-delivered to homes by my office, residents on Sellers Avenue voted in strong support for the installation of speed humps as a traffic calming measure. This proposed measure will help reduce speeding, combat cut-through traffic, and improve safety for all residents.</p> | 27 | 85 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 144114 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving Traffic Calming Measures on Gladstone Avenue, between Bloor Street West and Hallam Street | 2025.TE27.86 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Earlier this summer, Transportation Services and I met with local residents for a neighbourhood walk in the Bloor Street West and Gladstone Avenue area to discuss local community concerns and solutions. A key issue raised was regarding speeding and dangerous driving on Gladstone Avenue in gaps between existing speed hump locations. In 2000, the approved speed hump locations for Gladstone Avenue created a gap of over 90 metres at some locations. Residents are now experiencing the impact of that decision as speeding drivers race towards each speed hump.<br /> <br /> I am recommending the installation of additional speed humps on this section of Gladstone Avenue to reduce the dangerous gapping and match current City standards for the spacing of speed humps. The additional locations will work alongside speed humps recently installed on Gladstone Avenue north of Hallam Street. Together, these changes will reduce speeding and improve safety for residents and visitors to the neighbourhood.</p> | 27 | 86 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION |
| 144094 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving Traffic Calming Measures on Salem Avenue | 2025.TE27.87 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents on Salem Avenue have shared their concerns regarding speeding vehicles travelling south from Dupont Street. Currently, there are four speed humps on Salem Avenue, between Hallam Street and Dupont Street. Of the four locations, two speed humps meet the City’s spacing guidelines, while two are separated by 90 metres. This gap is located right near a very busy section of Dupont Street, where a number of near misses and accidents have already occurred as drivers increase speeds before reaching the next speed hump.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am recommending the installation of an additional speed hump to close this gap and improve existing traffic calming measures on Salem Avenue. The addition of this location will reduce the distance between the two speed humps to 44 metres, down from 90 metres, in line with the updated traffic calming policy.</p> | 27 | 87 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 144095 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Water Shuttle Pilot - Bathurst Quay Traffic Impact Review | 2025.TE27.88 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Waterfront Toronto is undertaking a pilot for an east-west water shuttle to test improved east-west mobility within the Toronto harbour. The pilot is planned to be operational for June 2026. One of the three planned stops for the pilot is Portland Slip. Other planned stops include the central waterfront (existing water taxi docks) and Biidaasige Park. Portland Slip is in the Bathurst Quay area, a busy destination and residential community; given this, a land-side traffic impact review and management approach is needed to address any potential local impacts for the proposed new stop at Portland Slip.</p> | 27 | 88 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 144116 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | A New Vision for the Washroom/Fieldhouse at Trinity Bellwoods Park | 2025.TE27.89 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Following a fire on the weekend of October 25 where the Trinity Bellwoods Park Ravine Fieldhouse/ Washroom Building was significantly damaged, it was determined by City staff that the building needs to be demolished and is beyond repair.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Residents and local stakeholders, like the Friends of Trinity Bellwoods Park have had questions and concerns about the building for some time, as it had been out of service for some time. My office has been working closely with these groups and with City staff on improvements to Trinity Bellwoods Park over the past three years and as part of this ongoing work, we should be making a new plan for this site.</p> | 27 | 89 | CCOUNCIL | TE | All | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 143985 | DFTBYLAW | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Introduction of By-laws | 2025.TE27.90 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council will introduce bills.</p> | 27 | 90 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | — | Draft By-law | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … |