| 145137 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | N | Naming of a Proposed Private Street Within the Alexandra Park Revitalization Area | 2026.TE29.1 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that the name "Bob Ellis Way" be approved to identify a proposed private street located within the Alexandra Park Revitalization Area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/">https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/</a>.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal is in alignment with the objectives of the <a href="Guiding Principles">Guiding Principles</a> for Commemoration in the Public Realm.</p> | 29 | 1 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | Public Notice Given | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | … | ACTION | true | Adopted | 9:30 AM | … | … | … | … | — | — | — | — | — |
| 145138 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 52200000 | N | Naming of a Proposed Public Street for a Development at 215 Lake Shore Boulevard East | 2026.TE29.2 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that the name "Chloe Cooley Street" be approved to identify a proposed public street located at 215 Lakeshore Boulevard.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal complies with the City of Toronto Street Naming Policy which can be found at <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/">https://www.toronto.ca/city-government/planning-development/street-naming/</a></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This naming proposal is in alignment with the objectives of the <a href="https://www.toronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/9844-Guiding-Principles-for-Commemoration.pdf">Guiding Principles</a> for Commemoration in the Public Realm.</p> | 29 | 2 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 144976 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 52200000 | N | Permanent Closure of Part of the Public Laneway Abutting 1684-1702 Queen Street East | 2026.TE29.3 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As this report recommends the permanent closure of a public laneway, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services recommends that City Council permanently close a portion of the public laneway located immediately west of Penny Lane and north of 1702 Queen Street East, described as Part of Lane on Registered Plan 435E and designated as Part 1 on Plan 66R-34694 (the “Subject Lane”). Transportation Services has determined that the Subject Lane is not required for public right-of-way or transportation purposes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Once closed, it is intended that the former public laneway will be sold to the applicant, Queen Kingston Holdings Inc., as nominee for and on behalf of Belgrove Beaches Limited Partnership, through the City’s real property disposal process administered by Corporate Real Estate Management, under authority delegated in Article II of Municipal Code Chapter 213 (Real Property) and approved through Delegated Approval Form No. 2025-109.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This closure and sale will facilitate the consolidation of the parcel with the adjacent redevelopment lands at 1684-1702 Queen Street East, consistent with Council’s prior direction and the holding (“H”) provisions in City of Toronto By-law 1018-2022.</p> | 29 | 3 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York |
| 145166 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 2004-2008 Bathurst Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.4 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 72.3-metre (19 storeys, excluding the mechanical penthouse and amenity level) mixed use building at 2004-2008 Bathurst Street. The Official Plan Amendment would allow commercial use in a non-house form building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The building is proposed to contain 71 dwelling units (including 7 rental replacement units), 218 square metres of commercial space at ground level, 72 bicycle parking spaces, and 73 vehicular parking spaces.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A 4.5-metre wide connection is proposed along the south lot line providing pedestrian access from Bathurst Street to the rear public laneway, as well as maintenance access to an existing City-owned sewer between 2002 and 2004 Bathurst Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A Rental Housing Demolition report will be considered in conjunction with this Report at the February 19, 2026, Toronto and East York Community Council meeting. The proposal includes the demolition of 6 rental housing units, to be replaced by a total of 7 rental units as part of the new development of the site. A Tenant Assistance Plan is proposed that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p> | 29 | 4 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's |
| 145154 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 2004, 2006 and 2008 Bathurst Street - Rental Housing Demolition Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.5 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of a Rental Housing Demolition application which proposes to demolish 6 rental dwelling units located at 2004, 2006 and 2008 Bathurst Street. The proposed development includes replacement of the same amount of gross floor area with 7 rental units. The proposal includes a Tenant Assistance Plan that addresses the right of existing tenants to return to replacement rental units at similar rents and provides financial compensation to mitigate hardship.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development on the site at 2004, 2006 and 2008 Bathurst Street is the subject of a related Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application (24 238898 STE 12 OZ). The proposed development would permit a 19-storey mixed-use building with 71 dwelling units at 2004, 2006 and 2008 Bathurst Street. An approval report for the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application has been advanced concurrently with this Rental Housing Demolition application approval report.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report also recommends approval of the Residential Demolition Permit under</p>
<p>Chapter 363 of the Toronto Municipal Code, subject to conditions.</p> | 29 | 5 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … |
| 144969 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | Y | 509 Parliament Street - Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.6 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This Report recommends approval of the application to amend the Zoning By-law to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building (38.5 metres including mechanical penthouse) at 509 Parliament Street. The proposal includes 60 dwelling units and approximately 278 square metres of ground floor retail.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property was identified by City Council as meriting designation under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act. The Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not yet in force and effect. The proposal includes partial retention of the front façade within the new development. A separate report from Heritage Planning regarding the proposed alterations to the designated heritage property will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 29 | 6 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | — |
| 144970 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 54000000 | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.7 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 144971 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | 55800000 | N | 509 Parliament Street (Carlton Theatre) - Alterations and Demolition of Heritage Attributes of a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 and 34 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.7a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on November 18, 2025 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2025.PB37.6">PB37.6</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Summary from the report (October 28, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</strong></p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve an application under Section 33 and Section 34(1) 1 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter and demolish heritage attributes of a designated heritage property at 509 Parliament Street (the Carlton Theatre), in connection with a Zoning By-law amendment application on the subject property, and that Council grant authority to enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property contains a one-storey brick masonry building constructed in 1929 as a movie theatre. The property is designated under Part IV, Section 29 of the Ontario Heritage Act. Toronto City Council adopted Designation By-law 103-2024 on February 7, 2024; however, the Designation By-law is currently under appeal before the Ontario Land Tribunal and is not in force and effect.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On March 21, 2023, the City received a Zoning By-law amendment application related to the proposed development of the subject property to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building. The proposed development includes the in-situ retention of the west (primary) elevation of the theatre along Parliament Street. A Heritage Impact Assessment prepared by ERA Architects Inc., dated June 20, 2025, was submitted to support the development application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Through revisions to the application, Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposal conserves the designated heritage property and is consistent with the policy framework. The heritage impacts of the development proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> |
| 145148 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | Y | 56-60 Yonge Street - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.8 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 65-storey (243.5-metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 648 residential units and 68 square metres of non-residential space.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed tower partially cantilevers over an existing 8-storey designated heritage building containing a hotel at 56 Yonge Street, which will be retained. The Official Plan Amendment is required to amend the Downtown Plan to not require the replacement of the existing office space and reduce the overall non-residential gross floor area provided on site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A separate report from Heritage Planning, on the proposed conservation of the designated heritage property at 56 Yonge Street will be considered by City Council in conjunction with this report.</p> | 29 | 8 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main |
| 145087 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 56 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.9 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the application for alterations proposed at the designated heritage property at 56 Yonge Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act in conjunction with an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of a 65-storey (246.2-metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 648 residential units and 68 square metres of non-residential space.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The project site contains the 8-storey designated heritage property at 56 Yonge Street and a 12-storey building at 60 Yonge Street which is not designated. The proposed tower would demolish the 12-storey building at 60 Yonge Street and construct the new tower at that site that would contain a cantilever to project 2.6 metres from the north elevation of the heritage property (south elevation of tower at 60 Yonge Street) over the heritage building. This projection would be four stories above the existing designated 8-storey hotel on 56 Yonge Street, which will be retained as is. This report also requests authority to amend an existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the building at 56 Yonge Street. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>In October 2019, City Council approved an application to alter the designated property at 56 Yonge Street and also to alter properties at 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West in conjunction with a development of the Commerce Court site. The application retained 56 Yonge Street in full and in situ. At that time, the only alteration proposed was to allow pedestrian access at the ground level from Yonge Street through the building and through the rear of the property to allow access to the new project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a result of the Commerce Court development, the property at 56 Yonge Street is already subject to an existing Heritage Easement. An amended Heritage Easement Agreement and Conservation Plan will be required. There is no conflict between the proposal that is the subject of this report and the approved alteration permit which already impacts the designated building at 56 Yonge.</p> |
| 145289 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 56 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.9a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on February 11, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB40.10">PB40.10</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (January 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the application for alterations proposed at the designated heritage property at 56 Yonge Street under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act in conjunction with an application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of a 65-storey (246.2-metres, including mechanical penthouse) mixed-use building, containing 648 residential units and 68 square metres of non-residential space.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The project site contains the 8-storey designated heritage property at 56 Yonge Street and a 12-storey building at 60 Yonge Street which is not designated. The proposed tower would demolish the 12-storey building at 60 Yonge Street and construct the new tower at that site that would contain a cantilever to project 2.6 metres from the north elevation of the heritage property (south elevation of tower at 60 Yonge Street) over the heritage building. This projection would be four stories above the existing designated 8-storey hotel on 56 Yonge Street, which will be retained as is. This report also requests authority to amend an existing Heritage Easement Agreement for the building at 56 Yonge Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In October 2019, City Council approved an application to alter the designated property at 56 Yonge Street and also to alter properties at 199 Bay Street and 25 King Street West in conjunction with a development of the Commerce Court site. The application retained 56 Yonge Street in full and in situ. At that time, the only alteration proposed was to allow pedestrian access at the ground level from Yonge Street through the building and through the rear of the property to allow access to the new project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a result of the Commerce Court development, the property at 56 Yonge Street is already subject to an existing Heritage Easement. An amended Heritage Easement Agreement and Conservation Plan will be required. There is no conflict between the proposal that is the subject of this report and the approved alteration permit which already impacts the designated building at 56 Yonge.</p> |
| 144972 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | Y | Zoning By-law Amendment for Garden Suites on Parkmount Road Facing Craven Road - Final Report | 2026.TE29.10 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On October 9 and 10, 2024, City Council directed City Planning staff through Item “TE16.75 - Council Direction on PH14.13 - Allowing Time for a Thorough Review”, to review garden suite zoning permissions for homes on Parkmount Road that back onto Craven Road between Danforth Avenue and Hanson Street, and to allow more time for the review that Council had previously requested. The Council decision directed staff to consider matters such as provincial planning changes, previous consultation, and modifications to the zoning by-law for better integration of garden suites in the area including appropriate setbacks from Craven Road for garden suites.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Garden suites have been permitted in Toronto’s Neighbourhoods since early 2022, when City Council adopted city-wide permissions. As a priority project of the Expanding Housing Options in Neighbourhoods (EHON) initiative, garden suites contribute to Toronto’s housing goals and targets, including the 2023 Housing Action Plan, and the Province’s housing target of 285,000 new homes in Toronto by 2031. The garden suite permissions provide opportunities through gentle intensification for a variety of living arrangements, providing flexibility for existing homeowners looking to rent a unit to tenants, creating additional units for multigenerational living, or those looking to downsize and age in place. To date, the City has received over 900 building permit applications for garden suites. In July 2025, Council adopted additional amendments to further support the effective implementation of garden suites in Toronto based on the findings from the Garden Suites Monitoring Program and to align Zoning By-law 569-2013 with recent provincial regulatory changes.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report presents the findings from the review, feedback from public consultation, and staff’s recommended approach to reflect the distinct context of Craven Road, including recommended amendments to the zoning by-law. The recommended zoning by-law amendment would continue to permit garden suites on Parkmount Road while providing minor modifications to performance standards that reflect and address several unique characteristics on Craven Road, notably the narrowness of the street, and the through-lot character of Parkmount Road versus the facing condition of the homes fronting onto Craven Road. Staff are aware of only one other street in the City that exhibits the same characteristics.</p> |
| 145297 | REPORT | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | Zoning By-law Amendment for Garden Suites on Parkmount Road Facing Craven Road - Supplementary Report | 2026.TE29.10a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In October 2024, Council-directed a review of garden suite zoning permissions for homes on Parkmount Road that back onto Craven Road between Danforth Avenue and Hanson Street. A Final Report from staff titled Zoning By-law Amendment for Garden Suites on Parkmount Road Facing Craven Road - Final Report was considered at the October 22, 2025 meeting of Toronto and East York Council. It presented the findings from the review, feedback from public consultation, and staff’s recommended approach to reflect the distinct context of Craven Road, including recommended amendments to the zoning by-law. Community Council postponed consideration of the item to provide additional time for engagement with local residents.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Since October, staff have attended several small group meetings with residents organized by the Ward Councillor and completed additional research and analysis for the study area to support the original review and address feedback. The results of the additional research and analysis were presented to the community at a public meeting on February 10, 2026. This report summarizes the additional work completed by staff since the item was deferred in October 2025.</p> | 29 | 10 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … |
| 145204 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 115 Saulter Street South - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applications - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.11 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit the development of two connected bar buildings of five and six storeys, with towers of 51- and 47-storeys respectively. The proposed total residential gross floor area is 68,288 square metres. Residential uses, including a proportion of affordable rental units, are located within the podiums and towers.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The non-residential gross floor area is 6,123 square metres, of which 1,489 square metres is intended for ground floor retail. A combination of Production, Interactive and Creative (“PIC”) non-residential uses will be dedicated to the remaining 4,643 square metres. The total gross floor area of the proposal is 74,734 square metres.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the applications to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law. The proposed applications are consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement (2024) and conform to the City's Official Plan, including the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan. This proposal was also reviewed concurrent with ongoing publicly-led precinct planning for the McCleary District, where this property is located.</p> | 29 | 11 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N |
| 145155 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WO_RECS | 54000000 | Y | 1684, 1698, 1700 and 1702 Queen Street East - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment - Decision Report - Approval | 2026.TE29.12 | — | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report reviews and recommends approval of the application to amend the Official Plan and Zoning By-law to permit a 10-storey mixed-use building at 1684, 1698, 1700 and 1702 Queen Street East. The proposed development would include 168 rental dwelling units,14,851 square metres of residential gross floor area, 859 square metres of new non-residential gross floor area and one level of underground parking. A future realignment of Penny Lane providing access on the north end of the site from the underground level to Orchard Park Boulevard is also proposed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed development is consistent with the Provincial Planning Statement, 2024, conforms to the City's Official Plan, and represents appropriate intensification that is compatible with the existing and planned context.</p> | 29 | 12 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Without Recs | Main |
| 145146 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 29-45 Berwick Avenue - Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application - Appeal Report | 2026.TE29.13 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On July 10, 2025, an Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application was submitted and deemed complete on August 14, 2025, satisfying the City's minimum application requirements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Official Plan Amendment proposes to redesignate the lands at 29-45 Berwick Avenue from Neighbourhoods to Apartment Neighbourhoods and permit a tall building on the site. The Zoning By-law Amendment proposes a 165-metre residential building (49 storeys, excluding mechanical penthouse). A Rental Housing Demolition Application has also been submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On December 15, 2025, the applicant appealed the Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Application to the Ontario Land Tribunal (“OLT”) due to Council’s failure to make a decision within the time frame in the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This Report recommends that the City Solicitor with the appropriate City Staff attend the OLT hearing to oppose the application in its current form and to continue discussions with the applicant to resolve any outstanding issues.</p> | 29 | 13 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report |
| 145152 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | 54000000 | N | 402 and 440 Unwin Avenue - Official Plan Amendment - Appeal Report | 2026.TE29.14 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On December 24, 2024, Studios of America Corporation submitted an Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application to the City for the lands municipally known as 402 and 440 Unwin Avenue (the Hearn site) in the Port Lands. The OPA proposes to introduce residential uses, remove portions of the Natural Heritage and Open Space System (including City-owned lands), and reconfigure the area’s street and transit network. The associated development concept proposes 19 residential towers, with approximately 8,400 residential units and an estimated 2,000 to 2,500 jobs through the adaptive reuse of the Hearn. The number and location of residential towers is conceptual and would be determined in future planning applications.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Port Lands are a significant long-term revitalization opportunity for the City, guided by a 50+ year vision set out in the Port Lands Planning Framework and implementing policies in the Central Waterfront Secondary Plan, approved by City Council in 2017 and by the Ontario Land Tribunal (OLT) on July 11, 2022. Significant tri-government investment – $1.4 billion starting in 2017 and $975 million in 2025 – has been committed to implementation, with flood protection and enabling infrastructure to unlock development north of the Ship Channel, including in Ookwemin Minising.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Hearn site includes a decommissioned coal-powered electrical generating station that is designated under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act and is a landmark heritage property within the Port Lands. The site is located north of the Martin Goodman Trail and Lakefront natural areas, adjacent to the Hydro One Switching Station, and near other port and industrial uses, including the Portlands Energy Centre and Toronto Port Authority Marine Terminal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The planning framework envisions the Hearn site as a major sport, cultural and entertainment destination, featuring parks and public open spaces. Residential uses are not permitted at the Hearn site due to its proximity to port, industrial and city-serving uses that support the city and regional economy, and many of which are major sources of emissions. The Hearn site is also isolated from the rest of the City, is not serviced with sanitary sewer or transit, and has inadequate water and road infrastructure. As such, residential uses are not permitted anywhere south of the Ship Channel – these lands are identified for port industrial, energy and city-serving uses, destination/catalytic uses, and parks and open space.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In early January 2026, the Province approved a new underwater electricity transmission line (the Third Line) that will connect to the Port Lands and will require a new converter station in the vicinity of the Hydro One Switching Station. Given that the location, route, and space for the Third Line are yet to be determined, there may be several potential impacts on the OPA application.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On November 6, 2025, Studios of America Corporation appealed the OPA application to the OLT due to Council not making a decision within the timeframe prescribed by the Planning Act. This report recommends that the City Solicitor and appropriate City staff attend the OLT to oppose the OPA application in its current form.</p> |
| 145165 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Planning Framework and Forest Hill Village Urban Design Guidelines Review - Final Report | 2026.TE29.15 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report summarizes the review and presents an updated St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Area Planning Framework, including revised Forest Hill Village Urban Design Guidelines. As part of this work, a transportation assessment was conducted and identified opportunities to improve safety, traffic operations, and active transportation connections. The updated Planning Framework and Urban Design Guidelines provide a comprehensive framework to guide growth, development, and community investment in the St. Clair Avenue West–Bathurst Street and Forest Hill Village areas.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street area is a vibrant, transit-accessible community with a diverse mix of residential, commercial, and institutional uses. The area contains a wide range of built forms, including mid-rise and tall buildings, low-rise walk-ups, and single and semi-detached houses, as well as tower-in-the-park style developments. Housing tenure includes condominiums, purpose-built rental apartments, co-operative housing, and affordable and supported housing. The area’s major streets are animated by a variety of small, independent shops, restaurants, and community-serving businesses, complemented by numerous parks and a complex ravine system.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Forest Hill Village, located along Spadina Road between Montclair Avenue and Strathearn Boulevard, is within the study area. The Village has a distinct main street character with a mix of commercial and residential uses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In February 2025, City Council directed City Planning to review and update the St. Clair Avenue West and Bathurst Street Area Planning Framework (2019) and the Forest Hill Village Urban Design Guidelines (2015). The purpose of this review was to renew the vision for the area and ensure the planning framework and guidelines reflect recent Provincial legislation changes, Official Plan amendments, new development approvals, and updated City objectives for affordable housing, retail vitality, the public realm, and sustainability.</p> |
| 145042 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 102 Glen Road - Demolition of a Structure within the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Approval of a Replacement Structure | 2026.TE29.16 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of an "Unrated" building within the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (SRHCD) and approve the design of a replacement building located at 102 Glen Road in accordance with Section 42(1) 2 and 42(1) 4 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan allows for the demolition of an "Unrated" building provided that the replacement building design complies with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District plan guidelines for new buildings and the applicable zoning by-laws. The proposed new three storey detached house meets the general intent of the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan's guidelines and would not detract from nearby rated heritage buildings in the immediate context.</p> | 29 | 16 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted |
| 145031 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 102 Glen Road - Demolition of a Structure within the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District and Approval of a Replacement Structure | 2026.TE29.16a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on January 19, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB39.6">PB39.6</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (January 2, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the demolition of an "Unrated" building within the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (SRHCD) and approve the design of a replacement building located at 102 Glen Road in accordance with Section 42(1) 2 and 42(1) 4 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This property is designated under Part V of the Ontario Heritage Act. The South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan allows for the demolition of an "Unrated" building provided that the replacement building design complies with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District plan guidelines for new buildings and the applicable zoning by-laws. The proposed new three storey detached house meets the general intent of the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan's guidelines and would not detract from nearby rated heritage buildings in the immediate context.</p> | 29 | 16 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale |
| 145084 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | WITHDRAW | — | N | 21 Baby Point Crescent - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in Teiaiagon-Baby Point Heritage Conservation District | 2026.TE29.17 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council refuse the alterations to the designated heritage property at 21 Baby Point Crescent under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This is a contributing property located in the Teiaiagon-Baby Point Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to construct a vestibule addition on the front of the building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This alteration does not comply with the Teiaiagon-Baby Point District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada (the official document guiding planning and conservation of heritage properties in the City of Toronto) and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.</p> | 29 | 17 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report | ACTION | Withdrawn | Main | — |
| 145036 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 377 Dundas Street West, 160 Huron Street and 1 Edmund Gate - Inclusion on the Heritage Register | 2026.TE29.18 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council include the following 3 properties on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register for their cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statements (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachments 1, 2 and 3.</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- 377 Dundas Street West</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- 160 Huron Street</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- 1 Edmund Gate</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 377 Dundas Street West is located at the southwest corner of Dundas Street West and Beverley Street in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood. It contains a two-and-a-half-storey house-form building, with a two-storey addition on the Beverley Street elevation. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 160 Huron Street is located in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood on the west side of Huron Street, mid-block between Cecil Street to the south and College Street to the north. The property contains three buildings; Building A is a four-storey walk-up apartment building on a raised basement constructed c.1913-1914; Building B is a two-and-a-half-storey house form building constructed c.1890 as a detached building and since integrated into the rear (west) elevation of Building A; Building C is a two-and-half-storey detached building that was constructed c.1890 to the rear (west) of Building B. A location map and current photographs of the property are found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 1 Edmund Gate is located in the South Hill area of the Casa Loma neighbourhood to the west of Avenue Road at the end of a private street overlooking Davenport Hill. The property comprises a circa-1920 estate on a large lot that contains a detached two-storey Georgian Revival house form building and ancillary structures, including a Georgian Revival pavilion, pool house, garage, and large terraced garden with brick garden wall. A location map and current photographs of the property are found in Attachment 3.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The properties recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register within this report have been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06, and each meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and are believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.</p> |
| 145027 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 377 Dundas Street West, 160 Huron Street and 1 Edmund Gate - Inclusion on the Heritage Register | 2026.TE29.18a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on January 19, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB39.3">PB39.3</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (December 29, 2025) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council include the following 3 properties on the City of Toronto’s Heritage Register for their cultural heritage value and interest according to the Listing Statements (Reasons for Inclusion) found in Attachments 1, 2 and 3.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>- 377 Dundas Street West</p>
<p>- 160 Huron Street</p>
<p>- 1 Edmund Gate</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 377 Dundas Street West is located at the southwest corner of Dundas Street West and Beverley Street in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood. It contains a two-and-a-half-storey house-form building, with a two-storey addition on the Beverley Street elevation. A location map and current photograph of the property are found in Attachment 1.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 160 Huron Street is located in the Kensington-Chinatown neighbourhood on the west side of Huron Street, mid-block between Cecil Street to the south and College Street to the north. The property contains three buildings; Building A is a four-storey walk-up apartment building on a raised basement constructed c.1913-1914; Building B is a two-and-a-half-storey house form building constructed c.1890 as a detached building and since integrated into the rear (west) elevation of Building A; Building C is a two-and-half-storey detached building that was constructed c.1890 to the rear (west) of Building B. A location map and current photographs of the property are found in Attachment 2.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject property at 1 Edmund Gate is located in the South Hill area of the Casa Loma neighbourhood to the west of Avenue Road at the end of a private street overlooking Davenport Hill. The property comprises a circa-1920 estate on a large lot that contains a detached two-storey Georgian Revival house form building and ancillary structures, including a Georgian Revival pavilion, pool house, garage, and large terraced garden with brick garden wall. A location map and current photographs of the property are found in Attachment 3.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The properties recommended for inclusion on the City’s Heritage Register within this report have been researched and evaluated by staff using the criteria prescribed in Ontario Regulation 9/06, and each meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining cultural heritage value or interest and are believed to be of cultural heritage value or interest.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On January 1, 2023, amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act (the Act) through the More Homes Built Faster Act, 2022 (Bill 23) came into effect. Under the Act, as amended, a municipal heritage register may include properties that have not been designated but Council believes to be of “cultural heritage value or interest", and that meet one or more of the provincial criteria for determining whether they are of cultural heritage value or interest. The Act now also limits listing to a period of two years.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The listing of non-designated properties on the municipal heritage register under the Act also extends interim protection from demolition and provides an opportunity for City Council to determine whether the property warrants conservation through designation under the Act should a development or demolition application be submitted.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As of January 1, 2023, should a property be subject to an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application, properties must be listed on the heritage register prior to Part IV designation and before the occurrence of a prescribed event. A prescribed event is a point of time when the application for an Official Plan Amendment, Zoning By-law Amendment and/or Draft Plan of Subdivision Application has been deemed complete and the City Clerk provides notice of that complete application to the public in accordance with the Planning Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Properties on the Heritage Register will be conserved and maintained in accordance with the Official Plan Heritage Policies. Heritage Impact Assessments (HIA) are required for development applications that affect listed properties.</p> |
| 145081 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal | 2026.TE29.19 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.</p> | 29 | 19 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | — |
| 145271 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 9 Drumsnab Road - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District - Refusal | 2026.TE29.19a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on February 11, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB40.7">PB40.7</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (January 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council refuse the alteration to the designated heritage property at 9 Drumsnab Road under Section 42 of the Ontario Heritage Act.</p>
<p>The subject site is a "B-rated" property located in the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District (HCD). The applicant proposes to remove the existing original windows and to enlarge certain features of the entryway assembly, including the sidelights, transom window, and door opening. These alterations do not comply with the South Rosedale Heritage Conservation District Plan, the Parks Canada Standards and Guidelines for the Conservation of Historic Places in Canada, and the Official Plan. As such, staff are recommending that this application be refused.</p> | 29 | 19 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter |
| 145089 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 1909 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.20 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the designated heritage property at 1909 Yonge Street and grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement (HEA). The owner is seeking permission under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter the property at 1909 Yonge Street and integrate it into the previously approved high-rise residential building project at 1913-1951 Yonge Street. This will require the existing Heritage Easement Agreement to be amended to include the property at 1909 Yonge Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dating back to the late nineteenth century, the property at 1909 Yonge Street is a late-Victorian vernacular 2-storey building. It retains its original scale and massing as a two-storey brick building with a gabled roof. It is part of the main street buildings at the intersection of Yonge Street and Davisville Avenue that was once the heart of the historic village of Davisville.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 1909 Yonge Street and grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement.</p> | 29 | 20 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N |
| 145291 | LETTER | N | N | SUPPL | ACTION | NO_ACTN | — | N | 1909 Yonge Street - Alterations to a Designated Heritage Property under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Amend a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.20a | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>At its meeting on February 11, 2026 the Toronto Preservation Board considered Item <a href="https://secure.toronto.ca/council/agenda-item.do?item=2026.PB40.8">PB40.8</a> and made recommendations to City Council.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Summary from the report (January 20, 2026) from the Senior Manager, Heritage Planning, Urban Design, City Planning:</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the designated heritage property at 1909 Yonge Street and grant authority to amend the existing Heritage Easement Agreement (HEA). The owner is seeking permission under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act to alter the property at 1909 Yonge Street and integrate it into the previously approved high-rise residential building project at 1913-1951 Yonge Street. This will require the existing HEA to be amended to include the property at 1909 Yonge Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dating back to the late nineteenth century, the property at 1909 Yonge Street is a late-Victorian vernacular 2-storey building. It retains its original scale and massing as a two-storey brick building with a gabled roof. It is part of the main street buildings at the intersection of Yonge Street and Davisville Avenue that was once the heart of the historic village of Davisville.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This report recommends that City Council approve the proposed alterations for the heritage property at 1909 Yonge Street and grant authority to amend the existing HEA.</p> | 29 | 20 |
| 145088 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | REFERRED | — | N | 153 and 185 Eastern Avenue - Alterations to Designated Heritage Properties Under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act and Authority to Enter into a Heritage Easement Agreement | 2026.TE29.21 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report recommends that City Council approve the alterations proposed for the designated heritage properties at 153 Eastern Avenue and 185 Eastern Avenue under Section 33 of the Ontario Heritage Act, in connection with a proposed development of the subject property. The proposed development application for the subject site contemplates the construction of three new residential towers, including commercial and community uses.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The development site, 153, 169, 171, and 185 Eastern Avenue, known as the Dominion Wheel and Foundries Ltd. Complex, comprises two significant heritage properties at 153 Eastern Avenue (Cleaning Room building) and 185 Eastern Avenue (Machine Shop building). The two buildings are unique examples of the industrial complex typology in the West Don Lands neighbourhood that reflect the historical evolution of the area from its earliest use as a Government Reserve, followed by its use as an important industrial centre in the late-19th and early-20th centuries.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On May 16, 2023, City Council stated its intention to designate the properties at 153 Eastern Avenue and 185 Eastern Avenue under Part IV of the Ontario Heritage Act, and on July 20, 2023, enacted Designation By-law No. 732-2023.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Heritage Planning staff are satisfied that the proposed alterations conserve the subject heritage properties and are consistent with the existing policy framework. The heritage impacts of the proposal are appropriately mitigated through the overall conservation strategy.</p> | 29 |
| 144973 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 55800000 | N | 411 Brock Avenue - Application to Remove a City Tree | 2026.TE29.22 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report requests that the Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 411 Brock Avenue. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting removal of the tree is because: its roots are lifting patio stones and cracking a concrete walkway, creating safety hazards; the tree has limited soil volume due to proximity to the house and a retaining wall, reducing stability; and as it grows taller, exposure to wind and inadequate anchorage increases concerns of potential uprooting.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Colorado blue spruce tree (Picea pugens) measures 45 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.</p> | 29 | 22 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 145103 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | 55800000 | N | 32 Curzon Street - Application to Remove a City Tree | 2026.TE29.23 | DELEG | PBNTGVN | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report requests that Toronto and East York Community Council deny the request for a permit to remove one City-owned tree located at 32 Curzon Street. The applicant indicates the reason for requesting removal of the tree is to accommodate the construction of a new curb and driveway access and that the tree obstructs sightlines.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The sugar maple tree (Acer saccharum) measures 11 cm in diameter. The City's Tree By-laws do not support the removal of this tree as it is healthy and maintainable. The permit was denied, and the applicant is appealing the decision. The Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision as to whether a permit may be issued when an applicant appeals the City's decision to deny a tree permit.</p> | 29 | 23 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated |
| 145135 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Changes to Business Improvement Area Boards of Management | 2026.TE29.24 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to appoint and remove directors from the boards of Business Improvement Areas (BIAs) that fall within its geographic boundaries.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to make changes to the Downtown Yonge, Historic Queen East, Leslieville, Midtown Yonge, Old Town Toronto, and Toronto Downtown West BIA Boards of Management, in accordance with the requirement of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 19, Business Improvement Areas.</p> | 29 | 24 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 145145 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Use of Nathan Phillips Square for Various Events - May 1 - September 30, 2026 | 2026.TE29.25 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The City of Toronto provides opportunities to access Nathan Phillips Square for eligible events through a permitting process administered by the Economic Development and Culture Division.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to request exemptions from Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 636, Public Squares, and the former City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 237, Nathan Phillips Square, for events that are proposed to be held on Nathan Phillips Square from May 1 - September 30, 2026.</p> | 29 | 25 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 145144 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Alberta Avenue (908 St. Clair Avenue West) - Construction Staging Area Time Extension | 2026.TE29.26 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>908 SCW Properties Inc. is constructing a 12-storey residential condominium building at 908 St. Clair Avenue West. The site is located at the northwest corner of St. Clair Avenue West and Alberta Avenue.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>By way of background, Toronto and East York Community Council, at its meeting on January 24, 2024, approved the closure of the west sidewalk, and a 5.5 metre wide portion of the west side southbound traffic lane on Alberta Avenue, from January 31, 2024 to January 3, 2026.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The developer is now requesting to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Alberta Avenue. The time extension is required due to delays from challenging site conditions encountered during demolition, excavation and shoring phases, which severely impacted the project and extended the project timelines.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In view of the above, Transportation Services is requesting authorization to extend the duration of the construction staging area on Alberta Avenue for an additional 12 months, from January 4, 2026 to January 1, 2027, to allow for the construction of the development to be completed. It should be noted that since January 3, 2026, the site has been operating under a monthly Street Occupation Permit.</p> | 29 | 26 | CCOUNCIL | TE |
| 145162 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | Tecumseth Street (723 Queen Street West) - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE29.27 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>BDA Inc. has undertaken the construction of a 4-storey shelter building at 723 Queen Street West. The site is located on the southeast corner of Queen Street West and Tecumseth Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to close the east sidewalk, the northbound and southbound bicycle lane, and a 0.4 metre wide portion of the northbound traffic lane on Tecumseth Street, between Queen Street West and the public laneway further south, for a period of 20 months, from April 1, 2026 to Dec 1, 2027. The temporary closure is required to facilitate construction staging operations.</p> | 29 | 27 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145150 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 140 Merton Street - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE29.28 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>EllisDon Community Builders is constructing a 29-storey residential building at 140 Merton Street. The site is located on the north side of Merton Street, between Yonge Street and Mount Pleasant Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the westbound curb lane and the north sidewalk on Merton Street for a period of 39 months, from March 1, 2026 to May 31, 2029, in order to enable construction staging operations for the development. Pedestrians will be redirected into a 2.1 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the westbound curb lane.</p> | 29 | 28 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated |
| 145147 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 30 Bond Street (St. Michael's Hospital) - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE29.29 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>EllisDon Corporation has undertaken the renovation of St. Michael's Hospital at 30 Bond Street. The site is located at the southeast corner of Victoria Street and Shuter Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the parking lay-by on the south side of Shuter Street, between a point 10.5 metres east of Victoria Street and a point 17 metres further east, for a period of 12 months, from March 10, 2026 to February 28, 2027, in order to accommodate a construction staging area for the renovation project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pedestrian operations will be maintained within the existing sidewalk on the south side of Shuter Street. The existing traffic and bicycle lanes on both sides of Shuter Street will be maintained.</p> | 29 | 29 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended | Main |
| 145149 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | AMENDED | — | N | 137 Bond Street - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE29.30 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pomerleau Inc. is constructing an 8-storey facility for the Toronto Metropolitan University (TMU) Student Centre at 137 Bond Street. The site is located on the southeast corner of Bond Street and Gould Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close the east sidewalk and a portion of the northbound lane on Bond Street for a period of 17 months, from February 20, 2026 to June 30, 2027, in order to enable construction staging operations for the project.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pedestrians will be redirected into a 1.5 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the northbound lane on the east side of Bond Street. On Gould Street, pedestrians will be redirected into a 1.5 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the existing sidewalk.</p> | 29 | 30 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Amended |
| 145164 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 1233-1243 Queen Street East - Construction Staging Area | 2026.TE29.31 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Leslie Street, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Woodbourne Canada Management Inc. is constructing a 10-storey condominium at 1233-1243 Queen Street East. The site is located on the southeast corner of Leslie Street and Queen Street East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting authorization to temporarily close a portion of the northbound curb lane with the provision of a temporary pedestrian walkway on the east side of Leslie Street and a full closure of Memory lane, between Leslie Street and a point 24.5 metres east, for a period of 22 months, from March 26, 2026 to December 31, 2027, in order to facilitate constructions staging operations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Pedestrians will be redirected into a 1.8 metre wide covered and protected walkway within the closed portion of the northbound curb lane on Leslie Street. A covered and protected walkway will be on installed on the south sidewalk of Queen Street East. Advisory signage will be installed to inform road users of the Memory Lane closure.</p> | 29 | 31 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report |
| 145098 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | 114 Ossington Avenue - Encroachment Appeal | 2026.TE29.32 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is for Toronto and East York Community Council to consider an appeal from the property owner of 114 Ossington Avenue regarding an encroachment application for a natural gas-fuelled fire pit installed within the public right-of-way, which is in contravention of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The property owner is seeking authority from Toronto and East York Community Council to permit the continued maintenance of the natural gas-fuelled fire pit within the public right-of-way. Transportation Services does not recommend that authority be granted.</p> | 29 | 32 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated |
| 145123 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Mirvish Village Business Improvement Area - Encroachment Appeal | 2026.TE29.33 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to request that Toronto and East York Community Council consider an encroachment application submitted by the City of Toronto’s Economic Development and Culture’s (EDC) Business Improvement Area (BIA) Office on behalf of the Mirvish Village Business Improvement Area (BIA). In partnership with the Mirvish Village BIA and EDC’s BIA Office, the proposal included the installation of a new parkette and streetscape improvements.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services recommends that Toronto and East York Community Council authorize the installation and maintenance of a 1.2 metre high decorative screen located within the Markham Street sidewalk, with zero setback from Poulter’s Place lane and 2.4 metre deep footings, nine (9) decorative light poles with 2.4 metre deep footings, and the installation of a water bottle-filling station within the Markham Street boulevard between Bloor Street West and Poulter’s Place lane. An approximately 2.5 metre pedestrian clearway will be maintained along Markham Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The decorative screen, the depth of the proposed footings, and the water bottle-filling station are in contravention of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 743, Streets and Sidewalks, Use of.</p> | 29 | 33 | CCOUNCIL | TE |
| 145168 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | 33 Yorkville Avenue - Noise Exemption Permit Refusal Appeal | 2026.TE29.34 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The matter before the Community Council is an appeal application for a noise exemption permit submitted by PEM (Yorkville) Holdings Inc.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The project, located at 27-37 Yorkville Avenue and 26-56 Cumberland Street, Toronto, also known as Concord Canada House, is a 72-storey condominium with 1397 Units.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The noise exemption permit was requested to conduct construction of a mixed-use residential and commercial development consisting of a 46-storey and 69-storey residential building above a commercial podium containing above-grade residential parking and retail, and below-grade commercial parking garage for Toronto Parking Authority.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application was refused by Municipal Licensing and Standards (ML&S) on the basis of the Ward Councillor's objection. The permit was inadvertently sent to the applicant and was later clarified and reverted in accordance with the Ward Councillor's objection. The applicant has appealed the refusal. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>As required for the appeal process, this staff report provides information to assist in the decision making for which Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision, namely a final decision under Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 591, Noise (Noise By-law) to either grant or refuse a noise exemption permit application given the appeal.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>If the Community Council grants the noise exemption permit application, it is subject to the conditions set out in § 591-3.2.D of the Noise By-law, unless the Community Council determines otherwise, and to any other conditions respecting health, safety and nuisance as the Community Council considers advisable.</p> |
| 145034 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 25 Augusta Avenue - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes | 2026.TE29.35 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.</p> | 29 | 35 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 145033 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 65 Broadway Avenue - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes | 2026.TE29.36 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.</p> | 29 | 36 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 145032 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | 54000000 | N | 117-127 Broadway Avenue - Designation of Fire Routes and amendment to Chapter 880 - Fire Routes | 2026.TE29.37 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>To obtain Toronto and East York Community Council approval for the amendment of the Fire Route By-law to designate certain locations as fire routes within the meaning of City of Toronto Municipal Code Chapter 880, as amended.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Fire Services uses designated fire routes as a key mechanism in regulating fire prevention, including the prevention of spreading of fires and the delivery of fire protection services.</p> | 29 | 37 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 144974 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Traffic Management in Ward 14 related to the King Street East and Church Street Intersection Project | 2026.TE29.38 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On April 23 and 24, 2025, City Council directed Transportation Services in consultation with the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) to report to the Toronto and East York Community Council with information on how the TTC tracks and watermain at King Street East and Church Street degraded to the point of requiring repair and associated diversion, and the ongoing active traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue, and Gerrard Street East, including a specific update on actions taken, and additional recommendations at Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The purpose of this report is to provide an explanation as to why the work at King Street East and Church Street was scheduled for 2025, and to provide a summary of the ongoing and planned traffic management measures for the area bounded by the Don River, Eastern Avenue, Broadview Avenue and Gerrard Street East, including additional recommendations for the intersection of Broadview Avenue and Dundas Street East.</p> | 29 | 38 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION |
| 144975 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Vehicle Width Restriction - Public Lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and Public Lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East | 2026.TE29.39 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is seeking authority to prohibit vehicles greater than two metres in width from travelling on the lane south of Gerrard Street East, west of Boulton Avenue and the lane east of Broadview Avenue, south of Gerrard Street East. Prohibiting vehicles which have a width of two metres or more from travelling in the subject lane sections would be beneficial in reducing the incidence of damage to the surrounding private properties.</p> | 29 | 39 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Deferred | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145170 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | POSTPONE | — | N | Safety Improvements on Davenport Road, Cottingham Road, Poplar Plains Road, and Macpherson Avenue | 2026.TE29.40 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This report seeks Community Council approval for several traffic operations changes and bylaw amendments to improve safety along Davenport Road, Cottingham Road, Poplar Plains Road, and Macpherson Avenue. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The proposed design includes safety improvements to two intersections and one mid-block change as listed below:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Poplar Plains Road between Cottingham Road and Boulton Drive: several proposed amendments to facilitate a new parking lane along the west side of Poplar Plains Road between Cottingham Road and Boulton Drive.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Davenport Road and Glen Edyth Drive and Cottingham Road: installation of a compulsory stop control southbound on Glen Edyth Drive at Cottingham Road to facilitate the realignment of this intersection.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Davenport Road and Poplar Plains Road and Macpherson Avenue: installation of traffic control signals and rescinding the existing westbound compulsory right-turn only limitation to create a normalized four-leg intersection with most movements (left-turn, right-turn and through) permitted. The existing southbound left-turn prohibition would remain due to geometric constraints. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Together, the proposed changes would improve safety though clear direction for people driving through intersections and would support new safe connections and crossings for pedestrians and people cycling. </p> | 29 | 40 |
| 145114 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Spaces - February 2026 (Delegated) | 2026.TE29.41 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation/removal of on-street accessible parking spaces for persons with disabilities.</p> | 29 | 41 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport, 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 145167 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Accessible Parking Space - Jones Avenue (Non-Delegated) | 2026.TE29.42 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jones Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval for the installation of an on-street accessible parking space on the east side of Jones Avenue.</p> | 29 | 42 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … |
| 145119 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Durie Street - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE29.43 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending the designation of a pick-up and drop-off area for the SimplySmart Child Care Centre & Montessori (2271 Bloor Street West) on the west side of Durie Street, between a point 10 metres south of Bloor Street West and a point 25 metres further south. Within this segment, the existing alternate side parking on both sides of Durie Street will be removed and parking will be permitted on the west side only. These proposed parking amendments will provide a designated and safe pick-up and drop-off area for parents and guardians accessing the SimplySmart Child Care Centre & Montessori.</p> | 29 | 43 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — |
| 145142 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Jones Avenue - Parking Amendments | 2026.TE29.44 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>As the Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) operates a transit service on Jones Avenue, City Council approval of this report is required.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending that the existing parking prohibition on the east side of Jones Avenue, between Ravina Crescent and a point 20 metres further south, be changed to a stopping prohibition. The proposed amendment will further deter parking at this location and will improve sight lines for drivers making southbound and northbound turns from Ravina Crescent. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>During the course of the investigation, it was noted that there is a discrepancy between the posted signs and the existing parking regulations. Recommendation 2 will correct this inconsistency.</p> | 29 | 44 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | — | — |
| 145156 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | All-Way Stop Control - Various Locations in Ward 13 | 2026.TE29.45 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is requesting approval to install all-way stop control at the following intersections:</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Front Street East and Cooperage Street</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Front Street East and Tannery Road</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Rolling Mills Road and Palace Street</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Based on the assessment undertaken, the installation of all-way stop controls are recommended and should enhance safety for all road users.</p> | 29 | 45 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 145102 | REPORT | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Pedestrian Way Designation and Streetscape Improvements - Collier Street between Church Street and a Point 28 Metres East of Church Street | 2026.TE29.46 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter that Community Council has delegated authority from City Council to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Collier Street, between Church Street and a point 28 metres east of Church Street, is scheduled for reconstruction, in conjunction with the addition of a City Council approved 27-storey condominium building at 717 Church Street, 85-89 Collier Street, and 93-97 Collier Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Transportation Services is recommending approval to redesignate the section of Collier Street between Church Street and a point 28 metres east of Church Street as a Pedestrian Way. Collier Street is currently designated as a Collector roadway. The proposed designation as a Pedestrian Way would prohibit access to motor vehicle traffic, while continuing to allow access to pedestrians and people cycling, emergency and maintenance vehicles and would provide additional public open space between Church Street and Park Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Motor vehicle traffic on Collier Street is currently restricted between Church Street and a point 28 metres east of Church Street (the west entry drive at 66 Collier Street), due to construction staging. This Council approved restriction is in effect until January 31, 2027.</p> | 29 | 46 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale |
| 145043 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Appointment of Community Member to the Applegrove Community Complex Board of Management | 2026.TE29.47 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Board further confirms that this nominee is qualified to serve under the provisions of the City of Toronto's Public Appointments Policy and the Relationship Framework for Community Centre Boards of Management. On behalf of the Board, I respectfully request that the City take the necessary steps to appoint this nominated candidate.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This appointment fills a vacancy on the board due to resignation: </p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Rachel Power, nominated at Applegrove’s Annual Meeting on June 12, 2025, appointed by the City at the Toronto and East York Community Council meeting on July 8, 2025, and resigned effective October 6, 2025.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>On behalf of the Board of Management, I respectfully request the City take the necessary steps to implement the above requested appointments. Thank you for your consideration of this matter.</p> | 29 | 47 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted |
| 145160 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Dufferin Street and St. Clair Avenue West Action Plan | 2026.TE29.48 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The intersection of Dufferin Street and St. Clair Avenue West is a transit hub located at the heart of a vibrant community connecting residents to transit, students and their families to nearby schools, and to popular local shops. Every day, this intersection and the surrounding area welcome thousands who contribute to Davenport’s local economy and the rich, diverse fabric of our community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>However, over the years, service and maintenance at Dufferin and St. Clair have not kept pace with growing use and needs at the intersection. This has affected the overall condition of the area and diminished its appearance. With several major community events planned for 2026 that will bring even more people to the neighbourhood, there is a clear need for a coordinated plan to enhance the intersection and better support residents, businesses, and visitors.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At the end of October, I joined local residents in the Dufferin and St. Clair community for a neighbourhood walk to hear directly about the issues at Dufferin and St. Clair and opportunities for improvement. A major concern shared by residents is the impact of inadequate street and sidewalk cleaning, with garbage often accumulating and spreading throughout the area due to limited servicing. City of Toronto staff joining us at this meeting also heard about the need to improve streetlighting, signal timing, and street furniture.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In follow-up discussions, my office consulted with City staff, local residents, and resident organizations to develop a targeted action plan to address these concerns and improve service delivery. This Dufferin and St. Clair action plan focuses on important next steps:</p>
<p> </p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">- Improving street and sidewalk sweeping measures to address cleanliness<br />- Assessing potential streetlight improvements for low-lit areas<br />- Implementing signal timing improvements to enhance traffic flow<br />- Identifying opportunities for additional garbage bin installations <br />- Expanding litter and garbage bin collection within the intersection and nearby areas<br />- Reviewing options to repair and install new street furniture, including benches and transit shelters<br /> </p>
<p>This action plan and the proposed measures will help to improve services and ensure that everyone living in the area or visiting can enjoy the best of our Dufferin and St. Clair community.</p> |
| 145095 | LETTER | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | College Street/Carlton Street Toronto Transit Commission (TTC) Turning Exemptions | 2026.TE29.49 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Starting as early as March 1, 2026, the City of Toronto and the Toronto Transit Commission will begin critical state of good repair work on streetcar tracks at the intersection of College Street and Bay Street, requiring the 506 Carlton streetcar and 19 Bay bus services to divert. To increase service coverage, the 506 Carlton streetcar will be supplemented with a 506 Carlton bus replacement service which will provide transit coverage closer to the original 506 Carlton streetcar route.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>For the Toronto Transit Commission to operate the diversions legally and effectively, two Toronto Transit Commission vehicle exemptions to existing left-turn restrictions along the 506 Carlton bus replacement routing are required. The existing and proposed restrictions are as follows:</p>
<p> </p>
<table style="width: 100.0%; border-collapse: collapse; border: none;" width="100%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 26.72%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Intersection</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.72%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Direction</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.44%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Turn Prohibited</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 17.98%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="17%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Existing Times and/or Days</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 26.12%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-left: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Proposed Times and/or Days</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 26.72%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Gerrard Street East / Gerrard Street West and Yonge Street</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.72%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Eastbound</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.44%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Left</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 17.98%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="17%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Mon. to Sat.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 26.12%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Mon. to Sat. (Toronto Transit Commission vehicles excepted)</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 26.72%; border: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-top: none; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Carlton Street and Jarvis Street</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.72%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Northbound</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 14.44%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="14%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">Left</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 17.98%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="17%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Mon. to Sat.</span></p>
</td>
<td style="width: 26.12%; border-top: none; border-left: none; border-bottom: solid windowtext 1.0pt; border-right: solid windowtext 1.0pt; padding: 0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;" width="26%">
<p style="margin-top: 8.0pt; text-align: left; text-autospace: none;"><span style="color: #16151c; layout-grid-mode: both;">7:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Mon. to Sat. (Toronto Transit Commission vehicles excepted)</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p>These diversions will last approximately six weeks, but a long term turning exemption for Toronto Transit Commission vehicles at this intersection will provide operational flexibility.</p> |
| 145322 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Euclid Avenue Traffic Calming Speed Humps | 2026.TE29.50 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Euclid Avenue is an interior residential street with schools and a heavily used children’s park. By TE28.47 - Euclid Avenue Traffic Calming, Toronto East York Community Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to TEYCC in Q1 2026 with immediate measures to discourage afternoon rush-hour cut-through traffic on Euclid Avenue between Dundas and Bloor, including additional speed humps.</p> | 29 | 50 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 145325 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Euclid Avenue Traffic Calming Turn Restrictions | 2026.TE29.51 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Euclid Avenue is an interior residential street with schools and a heavily used children’s park. By TE28.47 - Euclid Avenue Traffic Calming, Toronto East York Community Council directed the General Manager, Transportation Services, to report back to Toronto East York Community Council in the first quarter of 2026 with immediate measures to discourage afternoon rush-hour cut-through traffic on Euclid Avenue between Dundas and Bloor, including restricting left turns from Euclid Avenue onto Bloor Street and Harbord Street, during the afternoon rush-hour.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>There is no traffic light at these now dangerous intersections.</p> | 29 | 51 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | — | — | Community Council |
| 145346 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Plan for Heather McGregor Way | 2026.TE29.52 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>For more than 30 years, Heather McGregor has been the CEO of Toronto’s YWCA, a key Toronto charity that supports women. Their head office, at 87 Elm St., backs onto a walkway between Edward Street and Elm Street that is an extension of Chestnut Street. Ms McGregor is about to retire. The YWCA has requested that the walkway be renamed Heather McGregor Way, in recognition of her extraordinary service to the women of Toronto.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As the request was received late and the necessary public notice must be provided, I am requesting Toronto and East York Community Council direct staff to report to its April 1, 2026 meeting with recommendations to rename a section of Chestnut Street to Heather McGregor Way.</p> | 29 | 52 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 11 - University - Rosedale | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — |
| 145292 | REPORT | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Renaming Lawton Parkette in Honour of Carolyn Bennett | 2026.TE29.53 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In July 2022, City Council adopted the City of Toronto Commemorative Framework to guide the commemorative naming and renaming of streets, City properties, and monuments. This report considers an application submitted by Ward 12 (Toronto–St. Paul’s) City Councillor Josh Matlow to rename Lawton Parkette, located at 1600 Yonge Street, in honour of Dr. Carolyn Bennett.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The application was reviewed collaboratively by Parks and Recreation, Economic Development and Culture, and Strategic Partnerships. Staff have confirmed that the proposed renaming meets the requirements of the City of Toronto Property Naming Policy and aligns with the Guiding Principles for Commemoration. Staff therefore recommend approval of the proposed name, “Carolyn Bennett Park.”</p> | 29 | 53 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | New | — |
| 145274 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Dewbourne Avenue Parking Amendments | 2026.TE29.54 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to rescind the existing parking prohibition in effect on the south side of Dewbourne Avenue, from Chiltern Hill Road to Glen Cedar Road.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Dewbourne Avenue residents have requested that this parking prohibition be rescinded, citing the difficulty of finding parking on their street. The prohibition was installed to deter Metrolinx construction workers from parking on Dewbourne Avenue and is no longer required. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the parking reforms they have been organizing for.</p> | 29 | 54 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … |
| 145272 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Glebe Road East Parking Amendments | 2026.TE29.55 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I respectfully request your support for my motion to establish a drop-off and pick-up area on the north side Glebe Road East, to improve student access to The Study Academy’s Lower School.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The Study Academy’s Lower School serves neurodivergent students between the ages of 8 and 13 years old. My office has heard from parents that students face accessibility and safety challenges during the morning and afternoon drop-off and pick-up periods, exacerbated by the proximity to Yonge Street and increased local congestion.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A safe and accessible pick-up and drop-off zone is essential to ensure students can arrive at and leave school with greater ease and security. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the parking reforms they have been organizing for.</p> | 29 | 55 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 145273 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Tranmer Avenue Parking Amendments | 2026.TE29.56 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I am kindly asking for your support of my motion to rescind the existing parking prohibitions in effect on the south side of Tranmer Avenue and return the road to unsigned parking. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Tranmer Avenue residents have requested that this parking prohibition be rescinded, citing the difficulty of finding parking on their street. With the passage of this motion, the community will receive the parking reforms they have been organizing for.</p> | 29 | 56 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … |
| 145300 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Queen Street East Replacement Parking | 2026.TE29.57 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Queen Street Watermain and TTC Track Replacement project has required the temporary removal of 25 paid parking spaces between Davies and Broadview Avenues to support construction staging and traffic management. The area has already faced significant parking, and traffic impacts due to earlier emergency watermain work. The continued occupation of parking spaces despite construction delays, and the lack of proactive planning for replacement parking, has created ongoing concerns for residents and the local Business Improvement Areas (BIA). Staff have since identified potential temporary replacement parking on Davies Avenue and Hamilton Street.</p> | 29 | 57 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council |
| 145336 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Traffic Calming - Walter Street (between Kingston Road and Lyall Avenue) | 2026.TE29.58 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Residents have reached out to my office with concerns about pedestrian safety on Walter Street and on surrounding neighbourhood streets. Our office has received a petition from residents in support of the installation of speed humps on Walter Street.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>I am requesting that speed humps be installed on Walter Street between Kingston Road and Lyall Avenue.</p> | 29 | 58 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 19 - Beaches - East York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … |
| 145356 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving a Commercial Loading Zone on Margueretta Street | 2026.TE29.59 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>A business near Margueretta Street and Bloor Street West operates a commercial driveway on the west side of the property that provides access to a boulevard parking space and waste collection bins. The owner of this business has shared that there are significant issues with illegally parked vehicles impeding access to the front of their commercial driveway.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Commercial collection bins located near this driveway must also be frequently collected by large private vehicles, but blocked vehicles have prevented this service. The lack of waste collection is resulting in pest issues as bins overflow and has impacted the cleanliness of the area.<br /> <br /> Transportation Services recommends a no stopping prohition at all times on the east side of Margueretta Street directly adjacent to the commercial driveway used to access this business’ parking space and waste collection bins. These proposed improvements will better prevent illegal parking, restore access to boulevard parking spaces, and return proper waste collection by maintaining curbside access.</p> | 29 | 59 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION |
| 145353 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving a Commercial Loading Zone on St. Clarens Avenue | 2026.TE29.60 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>I have heard from business owners about the challenges they are experiencing with an existing commercial loading zone on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue just north of Bloor Street West. These business owners have shared that the loading zone is not sufficient in length to meet local demands and that parked vehicles on the west side of St. Clarens Avenue impede traffic when the loading zone is in use. A site visit in October confirmed problems with this commercial loading zone and potential solutions. <br /> <br /> Transportation Services recommends extending the community loading zone by 5 metres south and implementing a no-standing regulation at all times on the east side of St. Clarens Avenue as solutions. These proposed amendments will provide additional space for commercial vehicles, deter curbside parking, and improve traffic flow on St. Clarens Avenue.</p> | 29 | 60 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 145352 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving Permit Parking on Hallam Street | 2026.TE29.61 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In September 2025, a new cycling connection was installed on Hallam Street, between Dufferin Street and Bartlett Avenue, as a response to resident requests through the Wallace-Emerson Neighbourhood Streets Plan. The Hallam Street cycle track provides a safe connection and enhances the bikeway network across this community.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>As a result of this connection, on-street parking availability was reduced on the south side of Hallam Street. To improve parking availability for the community, residents and Transportation Services identified a no-parking area on Hallam Street that can be converted into visitor parking and overnight permit parking spaces. An amendment to this parking regulation will provide spaces for those with accessibility needs and up to seven parking spaces for visitors and residents. The proposed parking amendments will not impact neaby Dovercourt Public School or student safety.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Additionally, a review by Transportation Services determined that a request for an accessible parking space on Hallam Street is warranted. The review also identified inconsistencies in the traffic by-law related to currently signed parking regulations that must be corrected.</p> | 29 | 61 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … |
| 145337 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Improving Traffic Safety at Gladstone Avenue and Bloor Street West | 2026.TE29.62 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Last summer, I joined local residents for a neighbourhood walk in the Gladstone Avenue and Bloor Street West area to discuss traffic safety issues impacting the community. I heard directly from residents about the impact of visitors and food delivery drivers illegally parking on the east and west sides of Gladstone Avenue, north of Bloor Street West. This section of Gladstone Avenue is a two-way road, and parked vehicles limit visibility and access for pedestrians, cyclists, and other drivers. Parked vehicles also increase the risk of collisions as drivers are forced to enter northbound and southbound traffic to maneuver out of the area.</p>
<p><br /> As a solution, Transportation Services is recommending a no-stopping prohibition on Gladstone Avenue, between Bloor Street West and the first laneway further north. This proposed parking improvement will deter illegal parking, clear access for drivers, and improve safety for all road users.</p> | 29 | 62 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 9 - Davenport | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted |
| 145358 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Parking Amendments - Sheppard Street, between Richmond Street West and Adelaide Street West | 2026.TE29.63 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>My office has heard from local residents concerned about conflicting parking regulations on Sheppard Street between Richmond Street West and Adelaide Street West. I requested a review from Traffic Operations, which identified several safety and operational issues related to the narrow pavement width, two‑way traffic, and vehicles parking on both sides of the street. When cars park too close to intersections, they reduce visibility for both pedestrians and approaching drivers. Parked vehicles also force motorists to move into oncoming traffic to pass, and they hinder snow clearing and street‑cleaning operations.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To eliminate conflicting regulations and ensure that Toronto Police Service can issue tickets accurately and fairly, the proposed parking amendments will correct signage inconsistencies, improve sightlines for pedestrian and driver safety, and support better traffic flow for all road users.</p> | 29 | 63 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted |
| 145338 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Speed Limit Reduction - King Street West, between Dufferin Street and Strachan Avenue | 2026.TE29.64 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>My office has heard from local residents, including those on Joe Shuster Way abutting King and Dufferin, following a neighbourhood safety walk, who had concerns with speeding in their neighbourhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>A field investigation conducted by Traffic Operations found that there are no speed limit signs posted on King Street West between Dufferin Street and Strachan Avenue. Upon further review, it was determined that there’s currently no speed limit by-law for this section of King Street West, therefore, it operates under the default unsigned speed limit of 50 km/h. However, King Street West east of Strachan Avenue and west of Dufferin Street is by-lawed/posted with a 40 km/h speed limit.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>To ensure consistency with the majority of King Street West and to help reduce vehicle speeds along this segment, the speed limit should be reduced to 40 km.</p> | 29 | 64 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … | Letter | ACTION | Adopted | New |
| 145364 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Advancing Ongoing Community Engagement on the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Community Response Handbook | 2026.TE29.65 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>On October 22, 2022, the Toronto Police Service was called to Billy Bishop Airport, just before 4pm, to investigate a suspicious package attached to a bicycle on the mainland side of the airport. A tweet from Toronto Police identified it as "a potential explosive device".</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Residential buildings near the ferry terminal were evacuated, and residents were not permitted to return back home until after midnight. The neighbourhood was locked down. The suspicious package turned out to be an additional battery pack on an electric bike.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>While the community was relieved that it was not a real threat, the way in which the crisis was managed and the lack of communication led many in the community to feel shaken and unsafe.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In response, and with the strong advocacy of the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Association, The Emergency Response Framework for Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport was formed and the BQNA Community Response Handbook was developed.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>My office has worked closely with neighbours and City staff to ensure this handbook is reflective of community feedback and can be a safety resource for all in the neighbourhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>This handbook is intended to be a “living document” and will need to be reviewed throughout the future as the neighbourhood evolves. My recommendation is aimed at ensuring there is a regular and reliable space for the community to be consulted on future updates and improvements to the handbook so it can continue to be reflective of feedback from residents of Bathurst Quay.</p> | 29 |
| 145365 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Framework for Event Permitting at Bathurst Quay Common | 2026.TE29.66 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In 2024 Bathurst Quay Common, a new local park, opened at the historic Canada Malting Silos property in the heart of the Bathurst Quay neighbourhood.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Bathurst Quay Common provides approximately 4,000 square metres of park space and features a multi-purpose plaza that can accommodate special events and cultural programming. The Malting Silos have been fully rehabilitated and are used for programming and projections, with plans for OCAD to utilize the site.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In 2026, a new arts and cultural centre operated by the non-profit Canada Ireland Foundation will open within the heart of the park. The ‘Corleck Building’ will function as a four-season waterfront hub for community, artistic and cultural programming in a restored heritage building.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Canada Ireland Foundation will be conducting extensive programming at the Corleck and Bathurst Quay Common in the future. To ensure that programming is coordinated at the site including events at the Corleck building, events programmed by Canada Ireland Foundation at Bathurst Quay Common, and other public permitting of Bathurst Quay Common and the Silos, Parks and Recreation staff should develop a framework for permitting at this site.</p> | 29 | 66 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 10 - Spadina - Fort York | N | … |
| 145360 | REPORT | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | 60 and 64 Dundas Street East - Residential Demolition Application | 2026.TE29.67 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>This staff report is about a matter for which the Toronto and East York Community Council has delegated authority to make a final decision.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In accordance with Section 33 of the Planning Act and the City of Toronto Municipal Code, Ch. 363, Article 6 "Demolition Control," the applications for the demolition of two existing attached 3-storey mixed-use buildings containing four vacant residential units at 60 and 64 Dundas Street East (Application Nos. 26 114740 DEM 00 DM and 26 1141746 DEM 00 DM) are being referred to the Toronto and East York Community Council for consideration to refuse or grant the applications, including any conditions, to be attached to the permit applications because a building permit has not been issued for a replacement building.</p> | 29 | 67 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 13 - Toronto Centre | N | … | Report | ACTION | Adopted | New | Delegated |
| 145367 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Ontario Line Gertrude Gate Conditions | 2026.TE29.68 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>In January, TEYCC approved my motion requesting that Metrolinx host an in‑person meeting with the community affected by the Gertrude Place Gate to discuss ongoing concerns related to truck access on Gertrude Place.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>At the in‑person meeting on February 11th, it was acknowledged that continued use of the Danforth gate remains operationally feasible, though it would require on‑site backing maneuvers and a flag person, resulting in longer processing times and higher project costs. Given these trade‑offs, it is essential that the contractor operate as a good neighbour to the surrounding community. The recommendations put forward by residents are intended to meaningfully reduce the impacts of what will be a long‑term, highly intrusive construction site, and careful review and implementation of these measures will help ensure that daily operations are carried out with respect for the neighbourhood that will be living beside this work for years to come.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>In light of these concerns, I am requesting that the following measures be implemented as part of the permit conditions granting truck access to Gertrude Place.</p> | 29 | 68 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 14 - Toronto - Danforth | N | … | Letter |
| 145368 | LETTER | N | N | NEW | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Transportation Study | 2026.TE29.69 | — | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>The Bathurst Quay neighbourhood is a busy destination and residential community that continues to see growth. Residents continue to express concerns related to traffic and pedestrian safety, particularly at the intersections of Bathurst Avenue and Lake Shore Boulevard and Eireann Quay and Queens Quay Boulevard.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The last set of studies were conducted to inform the Bathurst Quay Neighbourhood Plan and associated Official Plan Amendment, which were adopted by City Council in July 2017. Since then the City has completed Bathurst Quay Common, a new park including the restored Malting Silos, and work is ongoing within the Corleck building, which will be a new signature destination celebrating Irish culture and heritage. There have also been significant development proposals along Queens Quay. Further, the waterfront is a venue for large special events that are hosted throughout the year.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The neighbourhood is also home to Billy Bishop Toronto City Airport and is proposed to be the landing pad for the Hoverlink proposal. It is also a planned stop for the City and Waterfront Toronto east west water taxi shuttle pilot (3-5 years in duration). As noted in prior motions adopted by Toronto and East York Community Council, staff will be assessing the transportation impacts of these new marine proposals.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Given the transformation of the neighbourhood since the adoption of the Neighbourhood Plan and the growth anticipated in the coming years, City Council should direct staff to undertake a comprehensive multi-modal transportation study and road safety audit to establish baseline mobility conditions.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>The study will identify transportation pressures, pedestrian safety concerns, modal conflicts, and operational gaps, and will inform short-term improvements and longer-term mobility planning for the area.</p>
<p> </p>
<p>City staff have noted that this proposed transportation study can be funded through the existing approved Waterfront Revitalization Capital Budget.</p> |
| 145287 | DFTBYLAW | N | N | MAIN | ACTION | ADOPTED | — | N | Introduction of By-laws | 2026.TE29.70 | DELEG | — | Y | Y | Y | Y | <p>Toronto and East York Community Council will introduce bills.</p> | 29 | 70 | CCOUNCIL | TE | 4 - Parkdale - High Park, 9 - Davenport, 10 - Spadina - Fort York, 11 - University - Rosedale, 12 - Toronto - St. Paul's, 13 - Toronto Centre, 14 - Toronto - Danforth, 19 - Beaches - East York | N | — | Draft By-law | ACTION | Adopted | Main | Delegated | — | Community Council | … | … | … | … | … |